Finding the magnitude of a point inside 2 oppositely-charged uniform lines

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the net electric field at a point 0.202m on the y-axis between two charged lines: one with a charge density of 4.66 microC/m and the other with -2.5 microC/m. The correct approach involves using the formula for the electric field due to an infinite line charge, which is derived from Gauss's law and includes the radial distance from the line charge. The direction of the electric field vectors must be considered, as they point away from positive charges and towards negative charges, leading to a net vector towards the negative line charge.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electric fields and charge distributions
  • Familiarity with Gauss's law
  • Knowledge of the formula for the electric field of an infinite line charge
  • Basic vector addition principles
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the electric field formula for an infinite line charge using Gauss's law
  • Learn how to apply the principle of superposition for electric fields
  • Explore the concept of electric field directionality and vector addition
  • Review examples of electric fields between multiple charged lines
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physics students, particularly those studying electromagnetism, as well as educators and anyone seeking to understand electric fields generated by line charges.

digitaleyes
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Charged-line 1 (parallel to x-axis, lying on y=0m) has a charge per unit length of 4.66 microC/m.
Charged-line 2 (parallel to line 1, lying on y=.414m) has a charge per unit length of -2.5 microC/m.

Question: What is the magnitude of the net electric field at a point .202m on y-axis?

Homework Equations



I've got the formula E=sigma/epsilon-zero, but have not used it in an application yet. Very confused as to what to do.
Does the point being at .202m on y-axis have any relevance other than that it is INBETWEEN the two charged lines? Is the ".202m" arbitrary?


The Attempt at a Solution



I did (4.66 x 10^-6)/epsilon zero + (-2.5 x 10^-6)/epsilon zero and got a wrong answer. This stuff is very confusing to me and any help would be amazing.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You need to find the electric field vector of each line separately, then add them together. If the line charges are of infinite length, then there's a formula that describes the magnitude of the electric field at any point a distance r away from the line charge. You probably have a textbook with it in it. If not, the formula can probably be found online.
The direction of the electric field vector is away from a positive line charge, and towards a negative one. In this problem, since there's a positive charge on one side of the point and a negative charge on the other side, the two field vectors should add and the resulting vector should point towards the negative line charge.

I hope I haven't given too much of it away...
 
Last edited:
digitaleyes said:

Homework Statement



Charged-line 1 (parallel to x-axis, lying on y=0m) has a charge per unit length of 4.66 microC/m.
Charged-line 2 (parallel to line 1, lying on y=.414m) has a charge per unit length of -2.5 microC/m.

Question: What is the magnitude of the net electric field at a point .202m on y-axis?

Homework Equations



I've got the formula E=sigma/epsilon-zero, but have not used it in an application yet. Very confused as to what to do.
Does the point being at .202m on y-axis have any relevance other than that it is INBETWEEN the two charged lines? Is the ".202m" arbitrary?


The Attempt at a Solution



I did (4.66 x 10^-6)/epsilon zero + (-2.5 x 10^-6)/epsilon zero and got a wrong answer. This stuff is very confusing to me and any help would be amazing.
Your formula for an infinite line of charge (assuming it's infinite) isn't correct to begin with. You can derive it easily from Gauss law. There's supposed to be factor of r (radial distance from line of charge somewhere inside).
 

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
64
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
11K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K