Finding the maximum compression of the spring

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem related to the maximum compression of a spring, likely involving concepts from mechanics and energy conservation. Participants are examining discrepancies between calculated results and provided answers, particularly focusing on the height of an object in the problem statement.

Discussion Character

  • Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are questioning the source of a correction not included in the original problem statement. There is a focus on the vertical drop of the mass and its impact on the solution. Some suggest verifying the method with the lecturer due to inconsistencies in numerical answers.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring the implications of missing information in the problem. Guidance has been offered regarding consulting the lecturer for clarification on the discrepancies, indicating a productive direction in the conversation.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of a missing height value in the problem statement, which may affect the calculations and interpretations being discussed.

Sean Harold
Messages
3
Reaction score
2
Homework Statement
11. Figure 7 shows a 3 kg box starts to move down an inclined plane with initial speed of 5 ms. It travels along the smooth surface and finally compresses the spring which has the spring constant of 400 Nm. Determine the maximum compression of the spring. [Given gravitational acceleration, g = 9.81 ms ²]

Correction:
Theta is not given and the height of the box from the ground is 0.8m
Relevant Equations
By using the conservation of energy,
The initial of total energy=The final of total energy
∑Eᵢ=∑Eғ
Kᵢ+Uᵢ=Kғ+Uғ
mghᵢ+1/2mvᵢ²=mghғ+1/2kx²
(3)(9.81)(0.8)+1/2(3)(5)²=(3)(9.81)(0)+1/2(400)(x)²
61.044=200x²
61.044/200=x²
x²=0.30522
x=0.5525m
Here is the answer I got for the question.
16319724068101635167086205417130.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Where did the correction come from? It is not part of the statement of the problem that you posted. Your solution would be correct if the overall vertical drop of the mass were 0.8 m. However, the answer you got does not match the given answer so something is amiss.
 
kuruman said:
Where did the correction come from? It is not part of the statement of the problem that you posted. Your solution would be correct if the overall vertical drop of the mass were 0.8 m. However, the answer you got does not match the given answer so something is amiss.
My lecturer told me that she had forgotten to put the height of the object in the question.
 
Sean Harold said:
My lecturer told me that she had forgotten to put the height of the object in the question.
In that case, I think you should show your solution to your lecturer and ask her why your numerical answer does not match the given answer. Your method is correct and that's what counts.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Sean Harold
kuruman said:
In that case, I think you should show your solution to your lecturer and ask her why your numerical answer does not match the given answer. Your method is correct and that's what counts.
Alright thanks for the help.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
865
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K