1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Finding the maximum value of a gravitional force field

  1. Mar 28, 2015 #1
    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
    Two identical particles, each of mass m are located on the x-axis at ## x=+x_0 ## and ## x = -x_0##. At what point (or points) on the y-axis is the magnitude of ##\vec g ## a maximum value and what is its value there?

    2. Relevant equations
    Formula for gravitational field ##-2Gm \frac {y}{(x_0^2 + y^2)^{3/2}} ##

    3. The attempt at a solution
    The textbook's first step is to keep y a positive quantity. " If we keep y as a positive quantity, then the magnitude of the field is ##2Gm \frac {y}{(x_0^2 + y^2)^{3/2}} ##

    How is this a legal move? We want to find the maximum value, so shouldn't we be considering the entire y-axis and not just the part above the x-axis? How can we be so sure that the maximum is actually above the x-axis?
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Mar 28, 2015 #2

    jbriggs444

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    By symmetry it is obvious that the pattern of gravitational force below the x axis will be a mirror image of the pattern above. If you find a maximum for positive y, there will be an identical maximum for negative y. There is no point looking for both maxima when finding the one will reveal the other.
     
  4. Mar 28, 2015 #3
    The textbook also gives me a hint "Take the derivative of ##\frac {d \vec g }{dy} ## However, there are more than one variable in the formula for gravitational field. Therefore, why don't we take a partial derivative?

    Never mind. I just realized that ##x_0## is a constant. Therefore, a partial derivative is not needed.
     
  5. Mar 28, 2015 #4

    jbriggs444

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    There is only one variable. The other values are constants. You could call them variables and take a partial derivative with respect to y. Or you can call them constants and take an ordinary derivative with respect to y. Both amount to the same thing.
     
  6. Mar 28, 2015 #5
    We find locations of the maximum magnitude by setting the first derivative equal to 0. Since the expression is never negative, any extrema will be maxima.
    Expression: ##g = 2Gm \frac {y}{(x_0^2 + y^2)^{3/2}} ##.

    What makes this statement true? For example, the equation ## y = x^2 + 1 ## is never negative, but its extrema is a minimum.
     
  7. Mar 28, 2015 #6

    jbriggs444

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    You are right. As written, that reasoning is incorrect. More correctly, one could reason that since the expression is zero at zero, zero at infinity, bounded, strictly positive and continuously differentiable between that it must have at least one extremum which is a global maximum and at which the first derivative is zero somewhere in that range.
     
  8. Mar 28, 2015 #7
    thank you
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Draft saved Draft deleted



Similar Discussions: Finding the maximum value of a gravitional force field
  1. Find the maximum value (Replies: 2)

Loading...