Finding the Mistake in Falling Objects in an Elevator

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the dynamics of an object falling inside an elevator that is moving upward with constant velocity. Participants explore the implications of different reference frames, the effects of gravity, and the behavior of the object upon collision with the elevator floor. The scope includes conceptual reasoning and technical analysis of motion and collisions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes a scenario where an object falls from a height h inside an upward-moving elevator, asserting that it will reach the same height after an elastic collision with the floor.
  • Another participant questions whether the object was released from rest relative to the elevator, suggesting that the velocities need to be clarified for both the elevator and the object.
  • A third participant points out two errors: the need to consider the downward motion of the elevator when calculating the object's behavior upon bouncing, and the fact that the elevator's position changes during the object's fall.
  • Some participants emphasize the importance of the elevator's upward motion and how it affects the object's velocity and trajectory upon impact.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the dynamics involved, particularly regarding the reference frames and the implications of the elevator's motion. There is no consensus on the correct interpretation of the scenario or the calculations involved.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the importance of clearly defining the initial conditions, such as whether the object is released from rest and the implications of the elevator's velocity on the object's motion. There are unresolved aspects regarding the calculations of height and velocity after the collision.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those studying mechanics, particularly in understanding reference frames, motion in non-inertial frames, and the dynamics of collisions in varying contexts.

llandau
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
1. An elevator is moving upward with constant velocity V. We consider a frame of reference fixed to the elevator. Since it is not accelerating, our system is equivalent to, say, a frame of reference fixed to the ground (there are no inertial forces). Now, we are inside the elevator and let an object fall from a height h. The only force acting is gravity. If there is an elastic collision with the floor, the object will reach the same height h, as we expected.

2. If v=-gt is the velocity of the object relative to the ground, the velocity for an observer inside the elevator must be v'=-gt-V. So, x'=-(1/2)gt^2-Vt. At t=0, x'=h. We find that, when x'=0, v'=-sqrt(V^2+2hg). After the collision, the object will start moving upward with velocity sqrt(V^2+2hg) but it seems to me that it will reach a height less than h: h+V^2/g-(V/g)sqrt(V^2+2hg).

There must be a mistake somewhere. Can you help me finding it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
llandau said:
2. If v=-gt is the velocity of the object relative to the ground, the velocity for an observer inside the elevator must be v'=-gt-V.
Presumably the object is released from rest relative to the elevator? If so, then v = -gt is its velocity relative to the elevator and -gt+V is its velocity relative to the ground.
 
You've made two errors:
1) Relative to the fixed frame, the floor of the lift is moving downwards. When the ball bounces, it will not just reverse its velocity. What do you expect to happen if the lift is falling very quickly, and the ball is only just catching the floor up?
2) Bear in mind that by the time the ball has bounced, the elevator will have moved down so you must compensate for this in calculating the new height from the lift floor.
 
Henry: read the question again. The elevator is moving upwards, not downwards.

llandau: I agree with Doc Al. I would assume that the object began at rest relative to the elevator.
 
cjl said:
Henry: read the question again. The elevator is moving upwards, not downwards.

Oops, sorry misread that. Or: I took at as moving downwards with speed -V :wink:.Either way, the point still stands. What if the elevator is moving upwards at enormous speed, and the ball is going really slowly when it hits the floor? You certainly wouldn't expect it to just reverse its direction and maintain its speed, since it'd have to fall out the bottom of the lift to do that. It has to reverse its direction and maintain its speed relative to the floor of the lift.

And for the record, I also agree with Doc Al and cjl.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
10K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K