Finding the null space, matrix fun wee

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on finding the null space of a given matrix, revealing that the only non-trivial solution involves the variable 'a' being free while 'b', 'c', and 'd' must equal zero. The matrix row reduces to a form indicating that any value of 'a' results in a valid solution, confirming that the null space is spanned by the vector (1, 0, 0, 0). Additionally, participants clarify that the determinant being zero indicates the matrix cannot span R^4, implying the image space is not full-dimensional. This leads to the conclusion that the kernel has a dimension of one, with the basis vector being (1, 0, 0, 0).
mr_coffee
Messages
1,613
Reaction score
1
Hello everyone I'm confused on finding the null space on this problem:
the matrix is:
0 2 0 -5
0 1 4 0
0 0 1 0
0 0 0 1

null(A) =
2b - 5d = 0
b + 4c = 0;
c = 0
d = 0;
b = 0;
a = ?
You don't know what a is, so I'm quite confused. Any help?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Just a thought..your matrix row reduces to:

0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 0 1 0
0 0 0 1

Somebody else may have to check this.. but it suggests to me that the only values for b c and d are for the trivial solution, and a could be anything.
 
Last edited:
Ok, so here is your matrix:
A = \left( \begin{array}{cccc} 0 & 2 & 0 & -5 \\ 0 & 1 & 4 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \end{array} \right)
You want to know what the nullspace is of the matrix A. So this means you have an equation of the form.
A\vec x = \vec 0
which will look like (sorry LaTeX wasn't playing nice for me here, I'll just write it out):
[0 2 0 -5][x1] = [0]
[0 1 4 0][x2] = [0]
[0 0 1 0][x3] = [0]
[0 0 0 1][x4] = [0]
So to solve this you could:
Use gaussian-jordon elimination and reduce it to:
\left( \begin{array}{cccc} 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \end{array} \right)
as Hammie pointed out.

So this leaves you with:
x_1 = \alpha
x_2 = 0
x_3 = 0
x_4 = 0

Which is a matrix of the form:
\left( \alpha,0,0,0 \right) ^T

which typically you want to factor out the variables to yield:
\vec x = \alpha \left( 1,0,0,0 \right) ^TNow thinking of this in the algebraic sense, the solution to the system is:
(going back to the a, b, c, d notation:
a = \alpha
b = 0
c = 0
d = 0

Which, just as Hammie said. b,c,d are for the trivial solution while a could be anything.

I think an easy general method for solving for the null space is to:
1) reduce it as much as possible:
ex) (1 0 0, 0 1 0, 0 0 0)^T type of matrix

2) any row that is all 0's then set it equal to some variable.
3) write down a column vector describing the solutions, and factor out the variables.
 
Last edited:
Wow excellent explanation! thank you very much, both of you! :)
 
mr_coffee said:
Hello everyone I'm confused on finding the null space on this problem:
the matrix is:
0 2 0 -5
0 1 4 0
0 0 1 0
0 0 0 1
null(A) =
2b - 5d = 0
b + 4c = 0;
c = 0
d = 0;
b = 0;
a = ?
You don't know what a is, so I'm quite confused. Any help?

Yes, that's precisely correct. You can't solve for a because a doesn't appear in any of the equations. In particular if b= c= d= 0, No matter what a is, the linear transformation is will take (a, 0, 0, 0) to (0, 0, 0, 0).
What does that tell you about one basis vector for the null space?

You also have b+ 4c= 0 so that c= -(1/4)b as well as 2b- 5d= 0 so that
d= (2/5)b. That seems to say that if you take b to be anything, c= -(1/4)b, d= (2/5)b and a to be anything, all the equations will be satisfied. What does that tell you about the dimension of the kernel? What is a basis for the kerne?
 
Quick question, I'm now trying to find the imagine space of this matrix, but I took the determinant of the matrix and it is equal to 0, doesn't that mean there is no image space? Because there is a row of 0's it can't span R^4, so there can't be a unique solution for all varaibles right?
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K