Finding the Optimal Initial Speed for Circular Motion - What's the Solution?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves determining the optimal initial speed for a ball placed against the inner edge of a cylinder, specifically at a height of 4R, where R is the radius of the cylinder. The objective is for the ball to complete exactly 2 revolutions around the inside of the cylinder before hitting the ground.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the need for additional information, such as the masses of the ball and cylinder, and question the initial placement of the ball. Some suggest assuming the cylinder starts at a height of 4R and that the ball is at the bottom. Others explore the implications of neglecting friction and how it affects the forces acting on the ball, leading to considerations of angular frequency and kinematics.

Discussion Status

There is a growing understanding among participants regarding the nature of the problem, with some recognizing that it resembles a loop problem. Various approaches are being discussed, including the use of projectile kinematics and the relationship between angular velocity and period. However, no consensus has been reached on a specific method or solution.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the assumption of neglecting friction and the implications of gravity acting on the ball. The initial conditions and the setup of the problem remain a point of discussion.

roman15
Messages
68
Reaction score
0
this is the question.
A ball is placed against the inner edge of a cylinder at a height h=4R where R is the radius of the cylinder. What initial horizontal speed v0 tangential to the cylinder wall should be given to the ball so that it will have completed exactly 2 revolutions around the inside of the cylinder when it hits the ground?

I was completely lost when I saw this one!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is there any other information given? At least, the masses of the ball and cylinder should be provided.
 
Yeah, it's tough to know without an explicit description of where the ball is initially placed and where the cylinder initially is. I think you may have to assume that the cylinder starts 4R off the ground, and that the ball is at the bottom of the cylinder. So then you have to figure out the angular frequency that will let it do 2 revolutions by the time the cylinder falls the 4R distance.
 
the only other information is to neglect friction
the ball starts at the top of the cylinder and moves down along the inner edge of the cyclinder
 
Ah, now I can understand what the question means exactly.
Since there is no friction, the cylinder exerts only a normal force to the ball, and the normal force acts towards the center. The other force exerted on the ball is gravity, which points vertically downwards. Therefore, the horizontal component of v remains unchanged! Plus that the vertical component of v is due to gravity only, you can calculate the time period for one cycle & the time period for the ball to land on the ground, can't you? :wink:
 
Oh, I see now too. At this point the problem is just like any other loop problem. You need to look for a period of 2.5.
 
ok you i kinda came to this same realization today
since there is no initial vertical component of velocity and the acceleration is only due to gravity, can't i just use projectile kinematics to solve this now
where the change in height would be 4R and the range would be 2x the circumference of the circle
 
Why not just say that

[tex]v=\omega R[/tex] where

[tex]\omega = 2 \pi/ T[/tex]

and use kinematics to solve for how long it takes the ring to fall, and thus how long your period needs to be. Do you follow?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
10K