Finding the Product of 3 Linear Factors Using the Discriminant Method

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on finding the product of three linear factors of a cubic polynomial using the discriminant method. Participants express confusion about the correct form of the polynomial, particularly regarding the assumption of roots and the leading coefficient. It is suggested to represent the polynomial as 2(x-a)²(x-b) to account for a double root and ensure the correct leading coefficient. The importance of understanding the relationship between polynomial coefficients and roots is emphasized, along with the need for careful calculations to avoid mistakes. Overall, the method involves expanding the proposed solution and comparing coefficients to derive the correct cubic polynomial.
hostergaard
Messages
37
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



http://img42.imageshack.us/img42/1231/lobgave.jpg


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


i think that solution shuld look something like this:
(x-a)2*(x-k)
but I am pretty lost, so i need some help...:cry:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't think your conjecture works.

Firstly there is one rather easy value of k you might notice that will then give you two equal roots.

If that were the highest one it would save work. So that is worth asking - think about the form of your cubic function.

If you can't find any shortcuts like that, there are several ways to solve a problem like this.
Do you know the relation between coefficients of a a polynomial equation and its roots?
Or do you know and understand the discriminant of a cubic - what does that have to do in order for the cubic to contain two equal roots?

I have not worked out out yet, have to leave, and there seems to be a fair amount of calculation in it unless you get lucky. I may have missed something clever - but in the end you have to know and sometimes use the things that will always work.
 
hostergaard said:

The Attempt at a Solution


i think that solution shuld look something like this:
(x-a)2*(x-k)
but I am pretty lost, so i need some help...:cry:

Choosing (x-a)^2(x-k) to represent your polynomial causes two problems:

(1)You are effectively assuming that k is a single root of your cubic. Since you are not told this, I would not make this assumption.

Instead, use a different letter to represent the single root: (x-a)^2(x-b) represents a cubic with a double root x=a and a single root x=b

(2) The second problem is that (x-a)^2(x-b) has a leading coefficient of 1, whereas the given cubic should have a leading coefficient of 2. To solve this problem, just multiply your proposed solution by 2: p(x)=2(x-a)^2(x-b)

Try expanding this proposed solution, and then compare coefficients
 
Any progress?

I have done it by the discriminant method and promise you there is a simple answer. Even knowing the answer I cannot see any reasonable short cuts, so it seems to be a case of needing to know a general method as I said.

On the way you run into some pretty big numbers which is discouraging and often a warning of a mistake, but it works out in the end. So be careful to write out very clearly so you can pick up mistakes.(If you can get that you can also easily get the least of the k's - it is a rational number but rather weird for a student exercise leaving me wondering how these guys invented the problem.)
 
Last edited:
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K