MHB Finding the Product of Distinct Roots: A Complex Challenge

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on evaluating the product of sums of distinct roots of the equation \(x^7 - 7 = 0\), which has one real root and six complex roots. The product \(p\) is defined as the product of sums of all pairs of distinct roots, expressed mathematically as \(p = \prod_{1 \leq i < j \leq 7} (r_i + r_j)\). The challenge is to compute \(p^2\). The suggested solution involves using properties of symmetric sums and roots of unity, leading to a final evaluation of \(p^2\). This problem highlights the complexity of working with polynomial roots and their relationships.
lfdahl
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
747
Reaction score
0
Let $r_1,r_2, …,r_7$ be the distinct roots (one real and six complex) of the equation $x^7-7= 0$.

Let \[p = (r_1+r_2)(r_1+r_3)…(r_1+r_7)(r_2+r_3)(r_2+r_4)…(r_2+r_7)…(r_6+r_7) = \prod_{1\leq i<j\leq 7}(r_i+r_j).\]

Evaluate $p^2$.
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Here´s the suggested solution:
There are $21$ factors of $p$.

Let $a = 7^{1/7}$. Let $t = \frac{360^{\circ}}{14}$ and let $z(\theta) = \cos \theta + i\sin \theta$.

The first three factors are:

$r_1+r_2 = a + a z(2t) = a(\cos^2t + \sin^2 t)+a(\cos^2t-\sin^2t+i2\cos t \sin t) = 2a\cos (t) z(t)$.

$r_1+r_3 = a + az(4t) = 2a\cos(2t)z(2t)$.

$r_1 + r_4 = a + a z(6t) = 2a\cos(3t)z(3t)$.

In fact any sum of roots, $r_i+r_j$, $1 \leq i < j \leq 7$, has one of the three moduli:

$2a\cos(t)$, $2a\cos(2t)$ or $2a\cos(3t)$. This is due to the identity: $1+z(2\theta) = 2\cos \theta z(\theta)$.

Thus the product of all moduli is:

$p = (2a\cos(t)\cdot 2a \cos(2t) \cdot 2a \cos(3t))^7 = a^{21} = 7^3$, and we get the result: $p^2 = 7^6$.

Here we have used the identity $\cos(t)\cos(2t)\cos(3t) = \frac{1}{8}$.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top