MHB Finding the Product of Distinct Roots: A Complex Challenge

lfdahl
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
747
Reaction score
0
Let $r_1,r_2, …,r_7$ be the distinct roots (one real and six complex) of the equation $x^7-7= 0$.

Let \[p = (r_1+r_2)(r_1+r_3)…(r_1+r_7)(r_2+r_3)(r_2+r_4)…(r_2+r_7)…(r_6+r_7) = \prod_{1\leq i<j\leq 7}(r_i+r_j).\]

Evaluate $p^2$.
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Here´s the suggested solution:
There are $21$ factors of $p$.

Let $a = 7^{1/7}$. Let $t = \frac{360^{\circ}}{14}$ and let $z(\theta) = \cos \theta + i\sin \theta$.

The first three factors are:

$r_1+r_2 = a + a z(2t) = a(\cos^2t + \sin^2 t)+a(\cos^2t-\sin^2t+i2\cos t \sin t) = 2a\cos (t) z(t)$.

$r_1+r_3 = a + az(4t) = 2a\cos(2t)z(2t)$.

$r_1 + r_4 = a + a z(6t) = 2a\cos(3t)z(3t)$.

In fact any sum of roots, $r_i+r_j$, $1 \leq i < j \leq 7$, has one of the three moduli:

$2a\cos(t)$, $2a\cos(2t)$ or $2a\cos(3t)$. This is due to the identity: $1+z(2\theta) = 2\cos \theta z(\theta)$.

Thus the product of all moduli is:

$p = (2a\cos(t)\cdot 2a \cos(2t) \cdot 2a \cos(3t))^7 = a^{21} = 7^3$, and we get the result: $p^2 = 7^6$.

Here we have used the identity $\cos(t)\cos(2t)\cos(3t) = \frac{1}{8}$.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top