Finding the Range of k in a Quadratic Equation Problem

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the range of values for k in the quadratic function f(x) ≡ k(x+2)² - (x-1)(x-2) such that it does not exceed 12.5. Participants are exploring the implications of the quadratic's properties and the conditions under which the function remains bounded from above.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the use of calculus, specifically the second derivative, to determine conditions on k. Some express difficulty in applying calculus techniques, while others suggest examining the properties of quadratic functions. There is a focus on the implications of the coefficient of x² and the nature of the roots of the quadratic equation.

Discussion Status

There is ongoing exploration of the problem with various interpretations of the conditions for k. Some participants have provided insights into the relationship between k and the behavior of the quadratic function, particularly regarding its maximum value and the necessity for k to be less than 1 for the function to remain bounded. Multiple lines of reasoning are being examined, but no consensus has been reached yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of homework rules, which may limit the use of certain techniques. There are indications of potential typos or misinterpretations in the original problem statement, which are being addressed in the discussion.

coderot
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
1) Find the range of values of k such that the function f(x) \equiv k(x+2)^2-(x-1)(x-2) never exceeds 12.5. I've missed several stages of the computation because it is quite lengthy. I hope you get the flow of things.

My attempt...
(k-1)\left[ x + \left( \frac{4k+3}{k-1} \right)x + \frac{4k-2}{k-1} \right] \le 12.5Complete the square on LHS...
(k-1)\left[ \left( x + \frac{4k+3}{2(k-1)} \right)^2 - \frac{48k+1}{4(k-1)^2} \right] \le 12.5This boils down to...-196k \le -98 and so k \ge 0.5Solution given is: k \le 0.5 not sure why. Any help thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First off:
Can you see what info you may get from the second derivative of f?
You should get that k must be strictly less than 1, so that your (k-1) factor is necessarily negative.
That might be the reason why you get the wrong equality sign.
 
Sorry, I can't use the calculus technique for this. Yes, i know from the properties of quadratic functions that if the coefficient of x^2 is < 0 then f(x) is a max at x = -b/2a.

Thanks for the reply.
 
I'm not quite sure what you are doing. Also, if your goal is to solve for k, I'm not sure why you have x in your equations.

-Your first equation is quadratic in x
-Your second equation is linear in x
-Your third equation is again quadratic in x
-The remainder of your equations don't have x

-Junaid
 
coderot said:
1) Find the range of values of k such that the function f(x) \equiv k(x+2)^2-(x-1)(x-2) never exceeds 12.5. I've missed several stages of the computation because it is quite lengthy. I hope you get the flow of things.

My attempt...
(k-1)\left[ x + \left( \frac{4k+3}{k-1} \right)x + \frac{4k-2}{k-1} \right] \le 12.5Complete the square on LHS...
(k-1)\left[ \left( x + \frac{4k+3}{2(k-1)} \right)^2 - \frac{48k+1}{4(k-1)^2} \right] \le 12.5This boils down to...-196k \le -98 and so k \ge 0.5Solution given is: k \le 0.5 not sure why. Any help thanks.


If k > 1 the graph of y = f(x) is a parabola that opens upwards, so cannot remain <= 12.5. If k = 1 the function f(x) is linear in x but not constant, so again cannot remain <= 12.5 always. Therefore, we need ---at least--- k < 1 for the graph of y = f(x) to remain bounded from above (so the graph is a parabola opening downward). Now look at the three cases: (1) f(x) = 0 has two roots; (2) f(x) = 0 has a single root (repeated); and (3) f(x) = 0 has no real roots. In case (1) the maximum of f(x) occurs half-way between the two roots (obvious, but you may want to prove it---without calculus); so you can find the maximum value of f(x) in this case, and require it to be <= 12.5. This gives a range of k, and you can check that as k decreases, the value of max f(x) decreases also. When k decreases far enough, we reach cases (2) and (3) and still have max f < 12.5..
 
Ray Vickson said:
In case (1) the maximum of f(x) occurs half-way between the two roots (obvious, but you may want to prove it---without calculus); so you can find the maximum value of f(x) in this case, and require it to be <= 12.5.
Ray, went down this route and got exactly the same inequality as before. I need to show this result algebraically. I've tried a number of different routes on this and I always get the same result. The only conculsion that I can draw is that my initial statementf(x) \equiv k(x+2)^2 - (x-1)(x-2) \le 12.5from the given information is wrong. But I can't workout why.

@Junaid: You've spotted a typo. Thanks.
 
coderot said:
Ray, went down this route and got exactly the same inequality as before. I need to show this result algebraically. I've tried a number of different routes on this and I always get the same result. The only conculsion that I can draw is that my initial statementf(x) \equiv k(x+2)^2 - (x-1)(x-2) \le 12.5from the given information is wrong. But I can't workout why.

@Junaid: You've spotted a typo. Thanks.

For the problem exactly as written, the solution is that ##f_{\max} \leq 12.5## if and only if ##k \leq 1/2##. The point is that k needs to be smaller than something in order to ensure that the parabola y = f(x) opens downward and so remains bounded from above! All I can suggest is that you do it again---carefully--and if you are still confused, show us the work in detail.
 
Ray, been through the calculation, same result. Here is my working in full...
f(x) \equiv k(x+2)^2-(x-1)(x-2) \le 12.5k(x^2+4x+4)-(x^2-3x+2) \le 12.5kx^2+4kx+4k-x^2+3x-2 \le 12.5(k-1)x^2+(4kx+3)x+4k-2 \le 12.5for coefficient of x^2 &lt; 0, k &lt; 1 note: not assuming this is the correct result but just an educated guess as to the possible range for k.\Rightarrow 2(k-1)x^2+2(4kx+3)x+8k-4 \le 252(k-1)\left[x^2 + \left(\frac{4k+3}{k-1}\right)x + \left( \frac{4k-2}{k-1}\right) \right] \le 252(k-1)\left[x^2 + \left(\frac{4k+3}{k-1}\right)x + \left( \frac{4k+3}{2(k-1)} \right)^2 + \left( \frac{4k-2}{k-1}\right) - \left( \frac{4k+3}{2(k-1)} \right)^2 \right] \le 252(k-1)\left[x^2 + \left(\frac{4k+3}{k-1}\right)x + \left( \frac{4k+3}{2(k-1)} \right)^2 + \left( \frac{4k-2}{k-1}\right) - \frac{(4k+3)^2}{4(k-1)^2} \right] \le 252(k-1)\left(x+ \frac{4k+3}{2(k-1)}\right)^2 + 8k-4 - \frac{(4k+3)^2}{2(k-1)} \le 252(k-1)\left(x+ \frac{4k+3}{2(k-1)}\right)^2 + \frac{2(k-1)(8k-4)-(4k+3)^2}{2(k-1)} \le 25there is a max @ x=-\frac{4k+3}{2(k-1)} therefore\frac{2(k-1)(8k-4)-(4k+3)^2}{2(k-1)} \le 25\Rightarrow 2(8k^2-12k+4)-(16k^2+24k+9) \le 50(k-1)16k^2-24k+8-16k^2-24k-9 \le 50k-50-48k-1 \le 50k-50, therefore: -98k \le -49 divide both sides by -98 and k \ge 0.5
Note that the work here is alittle different as I attempted the problem again before posting but the result is the same. Hope this helps.
 
coderot said:
Ray, been through the calculation, same result. Here is my working in full...
f(x) \equiv k(x+2)^2-(x-1)(x-2) \le 12.5k(x^2+4x+4)-(x^2-3x+2) \le 12.5kx^2+4kx+4k-x^2+3x-2 \le 12.5(k-1)x^2+(4kx+3)x+4k-2 \le 12.5for coefficient of x^2 &lt; 0, k &lt; 1 note: not assuming this is the correct result but just an educated guess as to the possible range for k.\Rightarrow 2(k-1)x^2+2(4kx+3)x+8k-4 \le 252(k-1)\left[x^2 + \left(\frac{4k+3}{k-1}\right)x + \left( \frac{4k-2}{k-1}\right) \right] \le 252(k-1)\left[x^2 + \left(\frac{4k+3}{k-1}\right)x + \left( \frac{4k+3}{2(k-1)} \right)^2 + \left( \frac{4k-2}{k-1}\right) - \left( \frac{4k+3}{2(k-1)} \right)^2 \right] \le 252(k-1)\left[x^2 + \left(\frac{4k+3}{k-1}\right)x + \left( \frac{4k+3}{2(k-1)} \right)^2 + \left( \frac{4k-2}{k-1}\right) - \frac{(4k+3)^2}{4(k-1)^2} \right] \le 252(k-1)\left(x+ \frac{4k+3}{2(k-1)}\right)^2 + 8k-4 - \frac{(4k+3)^2}{2(k-1)} \le 252(k-1)\left(x+ \frac{4k+3}{2(k-1)}\right)^2 + \frac{2(k-1)(8k-4)-(4k+3)^2}{2(k-1)} \le 25there is a max @ x=-\frac{4k+3}{2(k-1)} therefore\frac{2(k-1)(8k-4)-(4k+3)^2}{2(k-1)} \le 25\Rightarrow 2(8k^2-12k+4)-(16k^2+24k+9) \le 50(k-1)16k^2-24k+8-16k^2-24k-9 \le 50k-50-48k-1 \le 50k-50, therefore: -98k \le -49 divide both sides by -98 and k \ge 0.5
Note that the work here is alittle different as I attempted the problem again before posting but the result is the same. Hope this helps.

You are NOT doing what I suggested.

For k < 1 the parabola y = f(x) opens downwards, so f is bounded from above (and can, therefore, have a finite maximum). For at least a range of k < 1, the equation f(x) = 0 will have two roots, and their mid-point will be the maximizing point of f(x). Just draw a picture of an upside-down parabola that cuts the x-axis in two points. You will then see what I am claiming.

So, the maximum of ##ax^2 + bx + c## occurs at ##x^* = - b/(2a). ## In your case this becomes
x^* = \frac{4k+3}{2(1-k)} giving a maximum value of
f_{\max} = f(x^*) = \frac{48k+1}{4(1-k)}.
(Note: this comes after a lot of simplification!) Since k < 1 the denominator is > 0, so the inequality we need is
\frac{48k+1}{4(1-k)} \leq 12.5 \Longrightarrow 48k + 1 \leq 12.5 \times 4 (1-k), or ##k \leq 1/2.##

Note that the max, (48k+1)/[4(1-k)] decreases as k decreases from 1/2, and when k decreases down to k = -1/48 the two roots of the quadratic coallesce. For k < -1/48 the quadratic has no real roots at all, so f(x) < 0 for all x. The value ##f_{\max} = (48k+1)/[4(1-k)]## still applies in this case, but the calculus-free argument no longer applies and you need to use another way of seeing the result.
 
  • #10
coderot said:
Ray, been through the calculation, same result. Here is my working in full...
f(x) \equiv k(x+2)^2-(x-1)(x-2) \le 12.5k(x^2+4x+4)-(x^2-3x+2) \le 12.5kx^2+4kx+4k-x^2+3x-2 \le 12.5(k-1)x^2+(4kx+3)x+4k-2 \le 12.5for coefficient of x^2 &lt; 0, k &lt; 1 note: not assuming this is the correct result but just an educated guess as to the possible range for k.\Rightarrow 2(k-1)x^2+2(4kx+3)x+8k-4 \le 252(k-1)\left[x^2 + \left(\frac{4k+3}{k-1}\right)x + \left( \frac{4k-2}{k-1}\right) \right] \le 252(k-1)\left[x^2 + \left(\frac{4k+3}{k-1}\right)x + \left( \frac{4k+3}{2(k-1)} \right)^2 + \left( \frac{4k-2}{k-1}\right) - \left( \frac{4k+3}{2(k-1)} \right)^2 \right] \le 252(k-1)\left[x^2 + \left(\frac{4k+3}{k-1}\right)x + \left( \frac{4k+3}{2(k-1)} \right)^2 + \left( \frac{4k-2}{k-1}\right) - \frac{(4k+3)^2}{4(k-1)^2} \right] \le 252(k-1)\left(x+ \frac{4k+3}{2(k-1)}\right)^2 + 8k-4 - \frac{(4k+3)^2}{2(k-1)} \le 252(k-1)\left(x+ \frac{4k+3}{2(k-1)}\right)^2 + \frac{2(k-1)(8k-4)-(4k+3)^2}{2(k-1)} \le 25there is a max @ x=-\frac{4k+3}{2(k-1)} therefore\frac{2(k-1)(8k-4)-(4k+3)^2}{2(k-1)} \le 25\Rightarrow 2(8k^2-12k+4)-(16k^2+24k+9) \le 50(k-1)16k^2-24k+8-16k^2-24k-9 \le 50k-50-48k-1 \le 50k-50, therefore: -98k \le -49 divide both sides by -98 and k \ge 0.5
Note that the work here is alittle different as I attempted the problem again before posting but the result is the same. Hope this helps.

Your error is going from
\frac{2(k-1)(8k-4)-(4k+3)^2}{2(k-1)} \le 25
to
2(8k^2-12k+4)-(16k^2+24k+9) \le 50(k-1).
This is false if k < 1, because in the fraction the denominator is < 0, so when you multiply through by it the inequality gets reversed: you should have
2(8k^2-12k+4)-(16k^2+24k+9) \geq 50(k-1).
 
  • #11
coderot said:
Ray, been through the calculation, same result. Here is my working in full...
f(x) \equiv k(x+2)^2-(x-1)(x-2) \le 12.5k(x^2+4x+4)-(x^2-3x+2) \le 12.5kx^2+4kx+4k-x^2+3x-2 \le 12.5(k-1)x^2+(4kx+3)x+4k-2 \le 12.5
You made a mistake, the coefficient for x is 4k+3.
Anyway, you made it very complicated. The quadratic expression (k-1)x2+(4k-3)x+4k-14.5 can not exceed or equal to zero. That is, the quadratic equation (k-1)x2+(4k-3)x+4k-14.5=0 has no roots. What is the condition for that?


ehild
 
  • #12
Ray, thanks for taking the time to respond. Most helpful.

ehild. You've spotted another set of typos, thanks. Yes, your suggestion offered a far more direct way to the result. The discriminant approach for roots that are not real didn't occur to me at the time of tackling this; but it's certainly something I'll consider in the future when doing these sorts of problems. Thanks for taking the time to respond.

Problem solved.
 
  • #13
coderot said:
Yes, your suggestion offered a far more direct way to the result. The discriminant approach for roots that are not real didn't occur to me at the time of tackling this; but it's certainly something I'll consider in the future when doing these sorts of problems.

Problem solved.

Look at the figure. A graph of a quadratic function can change sign only if the associated quadratic equation has two distinct roots. If the discriminant is less then zero, the function is either positive or negative. Remember, that is very useful.

ehild
 

Attachments

  • quadratics.JPG
    quadratics.JPG
    8.3 KB · Views: 408

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K