Finding the Relationship Between -sin 40 & -cos 50

  • Thread starter Thread starter lLovePhysics
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Relationship
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the mathematical relationships between trigonometric functions and the simplification of algebraic expressions. Participants confirm that -sin 40° is equal to -cos 50° based on cofunction identities, specifically using the identity sin(θ) = cos(90° - θ). Additionally, the conversation addresses the simplification of the expression (x² - 9x + 14)/(3x³ - 6x⁴) × (2x - 1)/(x² - 2x - 35) and the correct method for canceling terms in fractions. The correct approach involves factoring out -1 to maintain the value of the fraction while simplifying.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of trigonometric identities, particularly cofunction identities.
  • Knowledge of algebraic simplification techniques, including factoring and canceling terms.
  • Familiarity with the concept of standard deviation and its calculation.
  • Ability to interpret mathematical expressions and equations accurately.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study trigonometric cofunction identities in depth, focusing on their applications in problem-solving.
  • Learn advanced algebraic techniques for simplifying rational expressions, including factoring and polynomial division.
  • Research the definition and calculation methods for standard deviation, including variance and its significance in statistics.
  • Practice solving problems involving trigonometric identities and algebraic expressions to reinforce understanding.
USEFUL FOR

Students, educators, and professionals in mathematics or related fields who seek to deepen their understanding of trigonometric relationships and algebraic simplification techniques.

lLovePhysics
Messages
169
Reaction score
0
I know that sin 320 deg is equal to -sin 40 deg. However, how do you know that -sin 40 deg is equal to - cos 50 deg? Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hmm... I think it is something about cofunctions. I'm going to read more into it first. =]
 
You know because of the cofunction identities:

\sin{\theta} = \cos{(90-\theta)}

\cos{\theta} = \sin{(90-\theta)}

\tan{\theta} = \cot{(90-\theta)}

\cot{\theta} = \tan{(90-\theta)}

\sec{\theta} = \csc{(90-\theta)}

\csc{\theta} = \sec{(90-\theta)}
 
lLovePhysics said:
I know that sin 320 deg is equal to -sin 40 deg. However, how do you know that -sin 40 deg is equal to - cos 50 deg? Thanks

Draw a right triangle and look at the relationships.
 
Ok thanks.

Also, how do you solve this problem?:

\frac{x^{2}-9x+14}{3x^{3}-6x^{4}} \times \frac{2x-1}{x^{2}-2x-35}

I simplified it down to:

\frac{(x-7)(x-2)}{3x^{3}(-2x+1)} \times \frac{2x-1}{(x-7)(x+5)}

Is there a way to cancel out (-2x+1) and 2x-1? Is it okay to multiply (-2x+1) by -1 or is it wrong because it changes the value? When I set them equal to one another they cancel out to equal 0. Why is this?

Thanks.
 
lLovePhysics said:
Ok thanks.

Also, how do you solve this problem?:

\frac{x^{2}-9x+14}{3x^{3}-6x^{4}} \times \frac{2x-1}{x^{2}-2x-35}

I simplified it down to:

\frac{(x-7)(x-2)}{3x^{3}(-2x+1)} \times \frac{2x-1}{(x-7)(x+5)}

Is there a way to cancel out (-2x+1) and 2x-1? Is it okay to multiply (-2x+1) by -1 or is it wrong because it changes the value? When I set them equal to one another they cancel out to equal 0. Why is this?

Thanks.

Don't set them equal... you can do a number of things... you can multiply the numerator and denominator by -1... that keeps the fraction the same, and let's you multiply out the (-2x+1) by -1...

Or multiply the denominator by (-1)*(-1) which is just one so you're keeping the value of the fraction the same... but you can use one of the -1 to multiply (-2x+1) by -1...

The essential idea is that -2x+1 = -1*(2x-1) = -(2x-1). You can also think of it as factoring out the -1.

Remember that whatever operations you do, you don't want to change the value of the quantity you're evaluating...

When you cancel things out with multiplication, you're dividing something by itself... so you don't get 0, but 1...
 
Last edited:
learningphysics said:
Don't set them equal... you can do a number of things... you can multiply the numerator and denominator by -1... that keeps the fraction the same, and let's you multiply out the (-2x+1) by -1...

Or multiply the denominator by (-1)*(-1) which is just one so you're keeping the value of the fraction the same... but you can use one of the -1 to multiply (-2x+1) by -1...

The essential idea is that -2x+1 = -1*(2x-1) = -(2x-1). You can also think of it as factoring out the -1.

Remember that whatever operations you do, you don't want to change the value of the quantity you're evaluating...

When you cancel things out with multiplication, you're dividing something by itself... so you don't get 0, but 1...

Thanks for your reply! I didn't even see that you could factor -1 out. Does anyone know the correct definition of Standard Deviation and how to find it? I've searched on google and all that came up were some confusing equations...
 
Yes, u have to use those confusing equations to calculate standard deviation.
http://www.answers.com/topic/standard-deviation?cat=biz-fin#

I liked the one that's in "Accounting Dictionary" section(scroll down to there), and
if you further scroll down, wikipedia explains it all (including that bell curve)
 
rootX said:
Yes, u have to use those confusing equations to calculate standard deviation.
http://www.answers.com/topic/standard-deviation?cat=biz-fin#

I liked the one that's in "Accounting Dictionary" section(scroll down to there), and
if you further scroll down, wikipedia explains it all (including that bell curve)

Okay, I'm nowhere near that level of math so I've found a definition that I think I can apply. Please tell me if you think this is accurate or not:

"The standard deviation is a measure of spread- how far the observations in a set of data are from their mean."

Here's a problem of standard deviation:
Of the following lists of numbers, which has the smallest standard deviation?
a) 1, 5, 9
b) 3, 5, 8
c) 4, 5 ,8
d)7, 8 , 9
3) 8, 8, 8

So would you calculate all of their means for example (7, 8, 9): (7+8+9)/3=8 and then see how far the data {7,8,9} are from that mean?

In this case 8,8,8 has a mean of 8 which is the smallest out of all of them. Does that seem like the correct way to do it? Thanks
 
  • #10
there's a certain method to calculate the standard deviation.

First find the mean of each of those sets. Now Find the difference between each of the scores and the mean. Square each of them. Sum that, and divide that by the number of scores. Now square root the whole thing. That gives the Standard Deviation.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
873
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K