MHB Finding the roots of quadratic equation

paulmdrdo1
Messages
382
Reaction score
0
can you show me a way of solving this problem without considering the discriminant.

Find the roots of equation subject to the given condition.

$(2m + 1)x^2-4mx = 1-3m$ has equal roots.

I solved it using discriminant but I want to know other way of solving it. Thanks!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
paulmdrdo said:
can you show me a way of solving this problem without considering the discriminant.

Find the roots of equation subject to the given condition.

$(2m + 1)x^2-4mx = 1-3m$ has equal roots.

I solved it using discriminant but I want to know other way of solving it. Thanks!

you can complete the square and make the constant part as zero

first multiply by (2m + 1) to avoid redical

$((2m + 1)x)^2-2(2m)((2m+1)x) = (1-3m)(2m+1)$

add 4m^2 on both sides to complete square
$((2m + 1)x)^2-2(2m)((2m+1)x) + (2m)^2 = (1-3m)(2m+1)+ 4m^2$

or $((2m+1)x- 2m)^2 = (1-3m)(2m+1)+ 4m^2$

for the roots to be equal RHS has to be zero

now you should be above to proceed
 
Another way to do this is by "comparing coefficients".

If:

$x^2 - \dfrac{4m}{2m+1}x + \dfrac{3m - 1}{2m+1} = 0 = (x-r)^2 = x^2 - 2rx + r^2$

we get two equations:

$2r = \dfrac{4m}{2m+1}$

$r^2 = \dfrac{3m - 1}{2m + 1}$.

Thus:

$r^2 = \left(\dfrac{2m}{2m+1}\right)^2 = \dfrac{3m-1}{2m+1}$.

This allows you to solve for $m$, and thus solve for $x = r$.
 
where did you get this?

$(x-r)^2 = x^2 - 2rx + r^2$

I thought something similar to this by letting r to be the roots of my equation.

since $S = \frac{-b}{a}=r+r$

I get $\frac{-b}{a}=2r$

and $P=\frac{c}{a}=r\times r$

I get $ \frac{c}{a}=r^2$

now I will have the same equation as you do

$2r=\frac{4m}{2m+1}$

and

$r^2=\frac{3m-1}{2m+1}$

Am I thinking it the same way that you did?

the r here is the value that I will plug in place of x in my equation.

but from this $(x-r)^2 = x^2 - 2rx + r^2$ It seems x and r are different?

why is that? thanks!
 
Last edited:
In THIS equation:

$(x-r)^2 = x^2 - 2rx + r^2$

$r$ and $x$ ARE different.

But in THIS equation:

$(x - r)^2 = 0$

we must have $x - r = 0$ (0 is the square root of 0), and thus $x = r$.

And yes, you were thinking correctly, good job!
 
Oh yes that's helpful. :) thanks!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top