Finding the Volume of a Revolved Ellipse Using Calculus

Click For Summary
To find the volume of an ellipse revolved around the y-axis, the correct approach involves using the integral π∫(y=-b to b) x² dy, where x is expressed in terms of y from the ellipse equation. The initial attempt using the integral π*a*b*dθ was incorrect because it does not accurately represent the volume of the solid of revolution. A cross-section of the solid reveals that each disk's volume is πx²Δy, leading to the correct volume calculation. Understanding Riemann sums is essential as they form the basis for setting up integrals in calculus.
Smartass
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The problem is that an ellipse (centered at origin) is revolved about y-axis. Now I have to find the volume of this swept region. But how do I go about using calculus? I have to derive it.


Homework Equations


Volume of ellipsoid = 4/3*pi*abc (source wikipedia)
Equation of ellipse: x^2/a^2 + y^2/b^2 = 1

The Attempt at a Solution


integral(pi*a*b*dθ), limits 0 to pi. What is wrong with this?


Now I know after searching that the volume is given by integral(pi*y^2*dx), limits -b to b, but how do you get this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Smartass said:

Homework Statement


The problem is that an ellipse (centered at origin) is revolved about y-axis. Now I have to find the volume of this swept region. But how do I go about using calculus? I have to derive it.


Homework Equations


Volume of ellipsoid = 4/3*pi*abc (source wikipedia)
Equation of ellipse: x^2/a^2 + y^2/b^2 = 1

The Attempt at a Solution


integral(pi*a*b*dθ), limits 0 to pi. What is wrong with this?
What's right with it? Why would you expect it to give you the volume?
That would, of course, give \pi^2 ab. If a= b= r, your ellipsoid will be a sphere of radius r. Does \pi^2 r^2 give the volume of that sphere?


Now I know after searching that the volume is given by integral(pi*y^2*dx), limits -b to b, but how do you get this?
Actually, that's wrong. If the ellipse goes from x=-a to x= a, it wouldn't make sense to integrate dx from -b to b. If you were to integrate from -a to a, you would get the volume if that same ellipse were rotated around the x-axis. The correct formula is
\pi\int_{y=-b}^b x^2 dy

If you take a cross section of the rotated ellipsoid, perpendicular to the y-axis (axis of rotation) you get a circle of radius "x". It has area \pi x^2 and, imagining it as a thin disk of thickness \Delta y (the thickness is measured along the y-axis), volume \pi x^2 \Delta y. Summing over all such disks gives you a Riemann sum approximating the true volume. In the limit, the Riemann sums become the integral \int_{y=-b}^b \pi x^2 dy.

The real reason for learning about Riemann sums (you certainly never use them to actually calculate an integral!) is because most integrals are set up using them.
 
HallsofIvy said:
What's right with it? Why would you expect it to give you the volume?
That would, of course, give \pi^2 ab. If a= b= r, your ellipsoid will be a sphere of radius r. Does \pi^2 r^2 give the volume of that sphere?



Actually, that's wrong. If the ellipse goes from x=-a to x= a, it wouldn't make sense to integrate dx from -b to b. If you were to integrate from -a to a, you would get the volume if that same ellipse were rotated around the x-axis. The correct formula is
\pi\int_{y=-b}^b x^2 dy

If you take a cross section of the rotated ellipsoid, perpendicular to the y-axis (axis of rotation) you get a circle of radius "x". It has area \pi x^2 and, imagining it as a thin disk of thickness \Delta y (the thickness is measured along the y-axis), volume \pi x^2 \Delta y. Summing over all such disks gives you a Riemann sum approximating the true volume. In the limit, the Riemann sums become the integral \int_{y=-b}^b \pi x^2 dy.

The real reason for learning about Riemann sums (you certainly never use them to actually calculate an integral!) is because most integrals are set up using them.

That makes so much sense, thanks! To justify my attemp, what I did was evaluate the area of the ellipse (=pi*a*a) and then if I rotate it by a small angle, say dθ, then region swept by it would be the volume of that region. If I take dθ from 0 to pi, then one entire rotation of the ellipse takes place and volume of the entire region. I knew I was wrong, it just didn't feel right. But what you said is real good!
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K