Finding the x-component of a force using Coulomb's Law

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the x-component of the force between two point charges using Coulomb's Law. Initially, the force exerted by charge q1 on q2 was calculated to be -17.64N when q2 was positioned along the x-axis. After moving q2 2.4 cm in the positive y-direction, the new force was calculated as -16.37N, but the x-component was incorrectly derived using a 45-degree angle assumption. Upon clarification, it was recognized that the angle was not necessarily 45 degrees, leading to confusion in the calculations. The importance of accurately determining the angle based on the new position of q2 was emphasized for correct force component calculations.
cherrymilk
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


(1) A point charge q1 = -2.9 μC is located at the origin of a co-ordinate system. Another point charge q2 = 5 μC is located along the x-axis at a distance x2 = 8.6 cm from q1.

The answer to this was -17.64N.

(2) Charge q2 is now displaced a distance y2 = 2.4 cm in the positive y-direction. What is the new value for the x-component of the force that q1 exerts on q2?

Homework Equations


Coulomb's Law: F = k (q1q2)/(r^2)


The Attempt at a Solution


Seeing that q2's position had changed, I calculated the new force exerted using Coulomb's Law. I used 9*10^9 for k, and using the Pythagorean theorem, I calculated the new distance between the charges, which I got to be 0.089. After using Coulomb's Law, I got an answer of -16.37N. To find the x-component, I multiplied this value by cos(45), giving me a final answer of -11.58. This, however, is apparently incorrect and I'm confused as to why.

Any help would be appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why did you chose 45 degrees as the angle?
 
OtherWindow said:
Why did you chose 45 degrees as the angle?

Ah, I see what I did wrong. I just assumed that because they had drawn the line they way they did in the figure, the angle was 45 degrees. Silly mistake, thanks for that!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top