Finite Groups and Three Dimensional Pseudo Real Representations: An Exploration

  • Thread starter Thread starter rkrsnan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Representation
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the existence of finite groups with three-dimensional pseudo real representations, which are complex representations with real characters. It is clarified that a pseudo real representation has a Frobenius–Schur indicator of -1, indicating the presence of a skew symmetric invariant bilinear form. However, it is noted that such a form cannot be constructed in three-dimensional vector spaces, leading to the conclusion that no three-dimensional pseudo real representations exist. The conversation emphasizes the importance of focusing on irreducible representations and the nuances of degenerate versus nondegenerate bilinear forms. Overall, the findings suggest that the dimensionality constraints prevent the existence of the sought representations.
rkrsnan
Messages
53
Reaction score
0
Can you please give an example for a finite group with a three dimensional pseudo real representation? I can find examples of finite groups with 2, 6 and 8 dimensional pseudo real representations, but couldn't find any with a three dimensional pseudo real rep. Is there some theorem that states that it doesn't exist? Thanks!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
What do you mean by a "pseudo" real representation?
 
My apologies for the confusing terminology. What I meant was a complex representation which has real characters. It is also called a quaternionic representation. I also understand that for a pseudo real representation the Frobenius–Schur indicator will be -1. From wikipedia: "It is −1 exactly when the irreducible representation has a skew symmetric invariant bilinear form. These are the representations whose character is real but that cannot be defined over the reals."

I am guessing that we can not make a skew symmetric invariant bilinear form using three dimensional vectors. That explains why I can't find a three dimensional pseudoreal representation.
 
Careful - notice that the result you quoted about the Frobenius-Schur indicator applies only to irreducible representations. Are you only interested in these? If this is the case, then your guess that there is no nondegenerate skew symmetric bilinear form on a 3-dimensional vector space is correct and answers your question. Indeed, it's not too hard to show that if a finite-dimensional vector space V admits a nondegenerate skew symmetric bilinear form, then dimV must be even.

One piece of the puzzle remains: you have to also show that the form you get from F-S is nondegenerate. This follows from the invariance of the form and the irreducibility of the representation.

If you need any help filling out any of the details, be sure to post back.
 
Yes, I am only concerned with irreducible representations. I didn't know about the subtlety of the degenerate/nondegenerate bilinear forms though. Thanks very much for the reply and the help.
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K