Finite Square Barrier Scattering Example with Reflection Coefficient Calculation

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter ronaldoshaky
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Barrier Finite Square
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the calculation of the reflection coefficient in a finite square barrier scattering problem, specifically addressing the relationship between the coefficients of reflected and transmitted waves in quantum mechanics. Participants explore the mathematical expressions involved and the implications of boundary conditions on these coefficients.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents the wave function solutions for a particle incident on a finite square barrier and questions the correct expression for the reflection coefficient.
  • Another participant suggests that the reflection coefficient can be derived from the continuity of the wave function, proposing that certain amplitudes can be expressed in terms of others.
  • A different participant expresses confusion regarding the contributions of reflected and transmitted waves, seeking clarification on whether both should be considered in the reflection coefficient calculation.
  • One participant asserts that the reflection coefficient is simply related to the amplitude of the reflected wave and suggests scanning the textbook for clarity.
  • Another participant elaborates on the definitions of reflection and transmission coefficients, emphasizing the importance of boundary conditions and the flux ratios in determining probabilities.
  • This participant also notes that the complexity of the situation within the barrier does not affect the calculation of the reflection probability, which can be determined solely from the incoming and reflected wave amplitudes.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the role of various wave amplitudes in calculating the reflection coefficient. While some agree on the basic definitions, there is no consensus on how to incorporate all relevant contributions or the implications of boundary conditions.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight potential terminology issues and the need for clarity in defining coefficients. There is also an acknowledgment of the complexity involved in the middle region of the barrier, which remains unresolved.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to students and practitioners in quantum mechanics, particularly those studying scattering problems and wave function behavior in potential barriers.

ronaldoshaky
Messages
52
Reaction score
0
Hello to all,

I am looking at a scattering example in my book. A particle is incident from the left with energy E > Vo. The barrier is of width L, and located between x = 0 and x = L.

The solutions to the time-independent Schrödinger equation in eacch of the regions comprising the left and right of the barrier and inside the barrier are:

\psi(x) = G e^{ik_{1} x} + H e^{-ik_{1} x }... x < 0

\psi(x) = I e^{ik_{2} x} + J e^{-ik_{2} x }...0 \leq x \leq L

\psi(x) = K e^{ik_{1} x} + L e^{-ik_{1} x } ...x > L

The example in the book gives the transmission coefficient T = \frac{|K|^{2}}{|G|^{2}} but my question is what ratio gives the reflection coefficient?

I thought R = \frac{|H|^{2}}{|G|^{2}} but does the constant J play any part in determining the reflection coefficient?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think L = 0
G + H = I so H = I - G
I + J = K
so J = K - I

I just used the continuity of the wave function.

So reflection coefficient L = 0, H = I - G, J = K - I

right? I think its simple algebra when dealing with a single mode incoming wave.
 
Hi

I follow your algebra, but not sure I am understanding the whole picture. There is an example in my book with a finite square step and it has the reflection coefficient as

R = \frac{|H|^{2}}{|G|^{2}}

Do I need to add the contributions from H and J in the square barrier example? I think I don't get the full picture of what you are saying. Can anyone shed any light on this. Thank you again.
 
The reflection coefficient is just H. Can you scan the textbook page?
 
I'm afraid I don't have a scanner.
 
Terminology problems abound. Using your original notation:

1) the amplitude of the reflected wave is H
2) the ratio of the amplitude of the reflected wave to the incoming wave is r=H/G (often called the reflection coefficient)
3) the reflection probability is the ratio of the flux in the reflected wave to the flux in the incoming wave. (R = |r|^2 k_1/k_1) (also sometimes called the reflection coefficient)
4) the amplitude of the transmitted wave is K
5) the ratio of the amplitude of the transmitted wave the incoming wave is t=K/G (often called the transmission coefficient)
6) the transmission probability is the ratio of the flux in the transmitted wave to the flux in the incoming wave. (T = |t|^2 k_3/k_1 where k_3/k_1 is the ratio of wavevectors in the different regions) (also sometimes called the transmission coefficient)

For it to make sense, you don't want the L wave coming into the barrier from x>L. Moreover, it's crazy to use L twice in the same problem.

H,I,J,K must be determined by boundary condition matching. Once you have done that, the reflection probability is |H|^2/|G|^2 (without any reference to J).

The point is that something complicated goes on in the middle, but you don't need to look at what is going on there to determine the probability of reflection, you just count how many particles you get back, divided by how many you sent in.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K