Fire Starting Stick for Prairie Burns

  • Thread starter Thread starter McGuire Made
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fire Nichrome
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the design and feasibility of creating an electric fire starting stick intended for prescribed prairie burns in Iowa. Participants explore the technical aspects of using electric heating elements, specifically focusing on the materials and configurations needed to achieve sufficient temperatures for igniting dry grass without relying on traditional fuel-based drip torches.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks advice on configuring a battery-operated heating device using Nichrome wire, aiming for temperatures between 500 and 600 degrees Fahrenheit.
  • Another participant suggests that while an electric igniter is an interesting idea, the design challenge involves not just electrical components but also the physical properties of the heating element and its interaction with grass.
  • Concerns are raised about the efficiency of heat transfer when dragging a hot wire across grass, with one participant noting that contact for conduction heat transfer is poor and that heat loss to the air complicates ignition.
  • One participant emphasizes the significant energy requirements for heating, comparing the energy density of batteries to that of propane, suggesting that batteries may not provide sufficient energy for practical use.
  • Another participant discusses the potential for using a sparking igniter instead of a hot wire, highlighting the challenges of ensuring ignition and sustaining a flame in the presence of air movement.
  • There is mention of the need for experiments to determine the effectiveness of different designs and configurations for igniting grass.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the feasibility of the electric fire starting stick, with some supporting the idea while others argue that propane may be a more effective solution. The discussion remains unresolved, with multiple competing views on the practicality and efficiency of the proposed electric device.

Contextual Notes

Participants note limitations related to heat transfer efficiency, energy requirements, and the physical durability of the heating element when used in the field. There are also concerns regarding the safety and practicality of using high currents with batteries.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals interested in alternative methods for fire starting in controlled burns, as well as those exploring the technical challenges of electric heating elements in outdoor applications.

McGuire Made
Messages
2
Reaction score
1
I'm trying to figure out the best approach of creating an electric fire starting stick that we plan to use for prescribed prairie burns in Iowa. The drip torches we currently use are fuel based, and we are trying to move away from this if possible.

I need help determining how to configure a basic fire starting device using wire (Nichrome?), batteries, and a regulator to generate 500 to 600 degrees. The goal will be to drag the heating element across the base of the dry grass to ignite it in flames.
  • What wire/heating element do you recommend for this application?
  • Is there a way to use an 18-volt rechargeable battery from a weedwhacker to power the heating element? Or should it be powered by a 12-volt battery or something different?
  • What additional components should I include in my circuit to regulate the temperature between 500 and 600 degrees and to ensure the wire doesn't overheat and break?
Any other suggestions or recommendations you have would be greatly appreciated. The ultimate goal is to create a battery-operated heating element that can reach temperatures of at least 500 degrees and that can withstand continuous use and abuse.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
:welcome:

Interesting problem. I would drag a propane torch, but I'll accept your desire for an electrical igniter.

The design challenge is only partially electrical. Heating a wire efficiently is typically done by forcing current through a thin wire. Thinner and shorter the better. But such a thin wire is easily broken if you pull it through grass.

How long must the hot wire be? How fast are you dragging it? Is the hot wire parallel to or perpendicular to the direction of drag? How many seconds does a 500 degree wire need to be in contact with a blade of grass to ignite it?

A sparking igniter can be more physically tough. If the spark triggers when there is not a blade of grass in the gap, it won't light. If it does light a single blade, then air movement from dragging the device would easily blow it out again before spreading. You would need experiments to make a sparking draggable igniter.

Edit: Here is a commercial device close to what you have in mind.
a1eac114bb06aea461694958fe7271e7.jpg
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jim hardy
This sounds like something you'd drag behind a tractor. Big.

Most folks aren't aware just how much energy it takes to make heat.
778 foot-pounds make a BTU, the work to heat a pound of water one degree.. Water falling over Niagara Falls , 167 feet high, gets heated 167/778 = just 0.2 degrees F by the work gravity did on it in the tumble.

That's why electric charcoal lighters invariably have a plug and cord. This one's 500 watts, around only half a BTU per second,

upload_2017-6-10_9-38-10.png


which at 12 volts would be over forty amps.

I hate to sound like an "Abominable No-Man"
but i think you'll do a whole lot better with propane ..

If it's a small device you're contemplating for spot fires, why not peel a foot or so of nichrome from an old furnace heater and try your weedeater battery on it ?
Be aware the high current might wreck the battery or set it afire .
so do it outdoors and be sure not to strap it to yourself.
Around Lithium batteries - BE SAFE ! They're vicious creatures.
 
I was talking with a friend and my concept may not be practical or possible. This is what he had to say:
  • Cellulose type items, wood, paper, plant material, all will combust at the well-known temperature of 451F (hence the movie with that title). However, it depends on several factors. First the amount of moisture content and even dry looking plant material can have moisture in it.
  • To combust, the material itself must be at that temperature. Heat transfer depends on a temperature difference and there is a time factor involved as well as the method of transferring the heat. Think about a pan of water on the stove. It takes time to bring it to a boil. The hotter the burner is (or the higher the flame of a gas range), the quicker it will boil but it still takes time.
  • You can’t transfer much heat by dragging something hot over dry grass. The contact for conduction heat transfer is very poor. Heat from both the hot device and the material to be heated will also escape to the air which means it takes even more heat.
  • The reason a flame will ignite the dry grass is 1) the flame temperature is very high, propane is around 3600˚F, 2) the flame is hot gases which will easily surround items it is close to where something like a hot wire or plate has very poor contact.
I think the only way this could work if you had a very hot coil of wire with air blowing over it and that wire had enough heat content that the air temperature was extremely high (like a flame). This would take a huge amount of power and, no, the rechargeable battery would not have near enough power. Try using a hair dryer on high and blow it across a sample of the dry grass. I am sure it won’t ignite the grass. Note that the element in the dryer is probably glowing red (1600-1800 ˚F) and if not, you could block a little of the air inlet until it did glow red. The air probably still wouldn’t be hot enough (not even close to the wire temperature) and that hair dryer on high is probably rated at somewhere between 1300 and 1900 watts. To get 1900 watts from that battery you would have to draw 1900VA/18V=105 amps which I am sure it can’t do. It might have an energy rating of 3 amp hours so even if you could get 105 amps from it, it would only last 3/105=.0286 hours = 1.7 minutes = 102 seconds… but I doubt 1900 watts would be enough either.

Another problem is that if you just planned on dragging some wires across the grass, you would need something that wouldn’t break which if you drug it with a vehicle and there was any kind of loop or the wire was perpendicular to the path of dragging, it could catch on a weed or stick or rock and nothing would stop it from breaking. Let’s say you were going to try some thick wire, let’s say 14 gauge. Two feet would result in a temperature of 2200F and you would need 53 amps at 18 volts. Two feet isn’t much.

Any battery does not store much energy compared to a flammable liquid like propane. An 18V 3AH battery contains 3*18=54 watt hours of energy or 184 BTU. One gallon of Propane contains 91,220 BTU’s of energy. That gallon of propane weighs 4.2 pounds. A 5 gallon tank weighs about 16.6 lbs. So 4.7 gallons (max fill) with the tank weighs 36.3 lbs and has 428,734 BTUs or 11,810 BTU/lb. The battery weighs maybe 2.4 lbs so that is 76.7 BTU’s per pound. That means you would need 153 times the weight in batteries as a 5 gallon tank of propane for the same energy (2330 batteries).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jim hardy
McGuire Made said:
Any battery does not store much energy compared to a flammable liquid like propane...
... That means you would need 153 times the weight in batteries as a 5 gallon tank of propane for the same energy (2330 batteries).

He gave you a very good and thorough answer.
 
McGuire Made said:
The drip torches we currently use are fuel based, and we are trying to move away from this if possible.
What is your reason for this? It can hardly be Carbon Footprint limitation. :wink:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
16K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
7K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
29K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
11K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
21K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K