Firebrick wrapped with aluminum foil

  • Thread starter Thread starter M&M123
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Aluminum
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the thermal properties of firebricks, specifically comparing one wrapped in aluminum foil to one that is not, when placed above a gas burner. Participants explore heat transfer mechanisms, temperature assumptions, and insulation materials, focusing on theoretical and practical implications.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions which firebrick will have a higher temperature when one is wrapped in aluminum foil and the other is not, seeking equations for heat transfer.
  • Another participant raises concerns about the potential for the aluminum foil to melt or burn at high temperatures.
  • A participant estimates that a 25,000 BTU burner could generate around 1,000 degrees Fahrenheit, though this is uncertain.
  • One participant suggests that if the aluminum foil is subjected to high temperatures, it may deform, oxidize, or even catch fire, complicating the heat transfer analysis.
  • It is proposed that without the foil, the firebrick may experience higher convective and radiant heat transfer, resulting in a hotter temperature compared to the foil-wrapped brick.
  • Another participant expresses a desire to achieve a temperature difference of at least 100 degrees Fahrenheit between the two bricks and inquires about alternative insulating materials that can withstand high temperatures.
  • Participants discuss the effectiveness of insulating only the top of the firebrick and the challenges in calculating the temperature difference due to numerous influencing factors.
  • One participant suggests that a comprehensive analysis of energy exchanges would be necessary to derive a temperature differential equation.
  • A later reply requests clarification on the broader context of the temperature difference goal, indicating that the initial question may not encompass the entire objective.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various viewpoints on the heat transfer dynamics and the potential outcomes of using aluminum foil. There is no consensus on the exact temperature outcomes or the effectiveness of different insulation strategies, indicating ongoing uncertainty and debate.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge that the temperature calculations depend on multiple factors, including the burner characteristics, ambient conditions, and material properties, which complicates the ability to derive a straightforward formula.

M&M123
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I two firebricks, one is wrapped with 4 layers of aluminum foil and the other one is not. If both are placed 10 " above a gas burner (not in contact with the flames), which one will have a higher temperature? What equations need to be used to calculate heat transfer between aluminum foil and firebrick?

Assuming no air gap between aluminium foil and firebrick.

Thanks
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Is the burner hot enough to melt or burn the foil?
 
The burner Max BTU is 25000
 
At what temperature?
 
I am not sure what is the temperature a 25000 btu burner can generate... let's assume 1000 deg F
 
Any one of several things can happen since we are getting close to the melting point of the aluminum. At the very least it will deform and maybe fall off. It will certainly oxidize rapidly, which will result either in it turning to powder and falling off, or it could catch fire and burn away. The rapid oxidation may produce enough hydrogen to burn, and that may cause it to reach its melting point. So it really is not possible to know for sure what will happen.

But let’s assume we pick a lower number so that the aluminum foil retains its original physical configuration. Let’s also assume that the hot gas flow is the same and we will ignore any burning hydrogen shed by the aluminum.

Now the convective heat transfer in the two cases will depend upon the convective heat transfer coefficient. Without testing it, I don’t know the numbers for sure. But most likely the coefficient is higher without the foil, so more heat will be transferred to the brick in that case and it will get hotter.

We also have radiant heat transfer from the flame. That will be higher without the foil, so again the brick will get hotter.

Any heat that gets transferred to the aluminum covered brick will have to conduct through the aluminum, which will provide a small amount of thermal resistance, slowing down heat transfer to the brick. So again, the brick gets hotter without the foil.

So for this temperature assumption, all modes of heat transfer result in a hotter brick without the foil.

Edit: I'm used to working with flames that are between 2300 and 5000 degrees F. So that is why I was asking the question. But after thinking about it, a common burner is sucking combustion air in at a low rate via natural convection, so the flame temperature will be much less than my flames that are fed by huge air compressors. Also, in the ten inches above the flame, much ambient air will be drawn in, further cooling the flame exhaust gas. I'm guessing that actual gas flow temperature at the brick would be in the neighborhood of 500 degrees F, unless you did something to prevent exhaust gas dilution.
 
Last edited:
Thank you for the great response. You'r right, the flame temp is more likely to be around 500 than 1000.

What about if I just cover the top of one stone with foil?

I am trying to get a delta of at least 100 deg F between the two stones. Any other material you recommend to use as an insulator (can withstand at least 1000 F)
 
Thanks for the link, is it sufficient to insulate just top of the stone to get a 100 deg f delta. I am looking for formula to calculate temperature
 
  • #10
M&M123 said:
Thanks for the link, is it sufficient to insulate just top of the stone to get a 100 deg f delta. I am looking for formula to calculate temperature

You will not find it.

The temperature depends upon too many factors to be easily calculatable. The best you can do is analyse all the energy exchanges to set up a differnetial equation which you will then need to solve.
 
  • #11
It might help if you explained the bigger picture of what you are trying to do here. "Getting a temperature difference between the two bricks" doesn't sound like the whole story.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
Replies
12
Views
6K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K