First Law of Thermodynamics - Piston

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a cylinder with a massless piston containing an ideal gas, where sand is added to the piston causing it to move. The scenario is set under isothermal conditions, and participants are tasked with finding the total mass of the sand based on the first law of thermodynamics.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of the first law of thermodynamics and the ideal gas law, questioning the assumptions made regarding isothermal and adiabatic processes.
  • Some participants attempt to derive expressions for the mass of the sand using work and pressure relationships, while others challenge the validity of these approaches.
  • Questions arise about the initial and final pressures and volumes, and how these relate to the equilibrium of forces on the piston.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with various interpretations being explored. Some participants have provided clarifications regarding the definitions of isothermal and adiabatic processes, while others have pointed out potential errors in the initial reasoning. There is no explicit consensus yet, but the conversation is delving deeper into the mechanics of the problem.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating through the implications of the problem statement, particularly regarding the equilibrium conditions of the piston and the role of external forces before and after the addition of sand. There are indications of confusion about the relationships between pressure, volume, and the work done in the system.

rpthomps
Messages
182
Reaction score
19
A cylinder of cross-sectional Area A is closed by a massless piston. The cylinder contains n mol of ideal gas with specific heat ratio and is initially in equilibrium with the surrounding air at temperature T and pressure P. The piston is initially at height h1 above the bottom of the cylinder. Sand is gradually sprinkled onto the piston until it has moved downward to a final height h2. Find the total mass of the sand if the process is isothermal

Homework Equations



W=PV

W=mgh

The Attempt at a Solution



##\Delta U=\Delta Q-W\\\\##But the system is isothermal therefore##\Delta U= 0\\\\\Delta Q =W##The Work is being done by gravity ##mg\Delta h=PV\\\\mg(h_2-h_1)=PA(h_2)\\\\m=\frac{PA(h_2)}{(h_2-h_1)g}##Answer in text is##M=\frac{PA}{g}(\frac{h_1}{h_2}-1)##
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is not a 1st law problem. This is an ideal gas law problem.
 
Isothermal ≠ adiabatic.
 
Sturk200 said:
Isothermal ≠ adiabatic.

Yes, I agree. I thought I had kept that concept in mind in my solution above. Is this not the case?

Thanks again for looking.
 
rpthomps said:
Yes, I agree. I thought I had kept that concept in mind in my solution above. Is this not the case?

Thanks again for looking.
No. Your analysis is incorrect. It doesn't even determine the work correctly. Furthermore, the work is irrelevant to the solution of this problem.

What is the initial pressure and the initial volume? What is the final volume? From the ideal gas law, what is the final pressure? Considering the weight of the sand and the initial pressure, what is the final pressure? What do you get if you set your two relationships for the final pressure equal to one another?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: rpthomps
rpthomps said:
Yes, I agree. I thought I had kept that concept in mind in my solution above. Is this not the case?

Not quite. Isothermal means that temperature is held constant, whereas adiabatic means that no heat (thermal energy) is exchanged. (Remember that U stands for thermal energy.) If you look at the etymology, adiabatic means literally "not go through," so it refers to some physically intrinsic thing (energy) that is not being allowed to pass a barrier. Isothermal just means "equal temperature" -- no mention of a barrier. Thus energy is allowed to be exchanged in an isothermal process, and indeed the exchange of energy during such a process is often precisely the thing that allows the system to be kept at the same temperature throughout.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: rpthomps
Okay..I will look at the problem again but before I do, doesn't the statement ##\Delta U=0## mean that the gas doesn't increase its temperature and that by making ##\Delta Q## not 0 that I am allowing for the possibility of an adiabatic transfer of energy?

Again, thanks for spending your time on this.
 
rpthomps said:
Okay..I will look at the problem again but before I do, doesn't the statement ΔU=0\Delta U=0 mean that the gas doesn't increase its temperature and that by making ΔQ\Delta Q not 0 that I am allowing for the possibility of an adiabatic transfer of energy?

Nope, setting U=0 means that you are not allowing any heat energy to enter or leave the system. Under this assumption, if we add mechanical work to the system, for instance, then Q would have to go up and thus the temperature would have to increase. If, on the other hand, we had allowed U to be nonzero, then the input of mechanical work may have been counterbalanced by an output of heat energy, thus allowing the overall Q (and thus temperature) to remain constant.
 
Sturk200 said:
Nope, setting U=0 means that you are not allowing any heat energy to enter or leave the system. Under this assumption, if we add mechanical work to the system, for instance, then Q would have to go up and thus the temperature would have to increase. If, on the other hand, we had allowed U to be nonzero, then the input of mechanical work may have been counterbalanced by an output of heat energy, thus allowing the overall Q (and thus temperature) to remain constant.
This is totally incorrect. For an ideal gas, if ΔU = 0, the temperature is constant. Q = 0 (not ΔU=0) means that you are not allowing any heat energy to enter or leave the system. So, I agree with post #7. Not that this has anything to do with the solution of this problem, which is strictly an ideal gas law application.

Chet
 
  • #10
Chestermiller said:
This is totally incorrect. For an ideal gas, if ΔU = 0, the temperature is constant. Q = 0 (not ΔU=0) means that you are not allowing any heat energy to enter or leave the system. So, I agree with post #7. Not that this has anything to do with the solution of this problem, which is strictly an ideal gas law application.

Woah, yes that's completely right. Sorry. The book I use has a plus sign convention for W and I think that threw me off.
 
  • #11
rpthomps: Are you unable to answer the leading questions I asked you in post #5?

Chet
 
  • #12
Hey Chet: Still working on it. :) I usually have to think quite a bit about this stuff. What I lack in natural talent though, I gain in perseverance.
 
  • #13
rpthomps said:
Okay..I will look at the problem again but before I do, doesn't the statement ##\Delta U=0## mean that the gas doesn't increase its temperature

For an ideal gas, ##\Delta U=0## means the temperature is constant.

and that by making ##\Delta Q## not 0 that I am allowing for the possibility of an adiabatic transfer of energy?

##\Delta Q=0## means the process is adiabatic. Making ##\Delta Q## nonzero means there is a transfer of heat energy.
 
  • #14
USEFUL EQUATIONS:
##P_iV_i=nRT\\\\P_fV_f=nRT\\\\V_i=h_1A\\\\V_f=h_2A\\\\##

ATTEMPT AT A SOLUTION:

through substation and elimination##P_f=P_i\frac{h_1}{h_2}##At h2 mass of sand is in static equilibrium with the pressure of the gas, using Newton’s equations:##P_fA=mg\\\\P_f=\frac{mg}{A}\\##More substitutions:##m=\frac{P_ih_1A}{gh_2}##Which is different then the book still. Not sure, how they got the difference in values, that’s why I was thinking work originally.
 
  • #15
Your answer for Pf in terms of mg is incorrect. You left something out. What is it that you think you might have omitted from the equation?

Chet
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: rpthomps
  • #16
rpthomps said:
##P_f=P_i\frac{h_1}{h_2}##

Right. This follows from Boyle's Law.

At h2 mass of sand is in static equilibrium with the pressure of the gas, using Newton’s equations:

##P_fA=mg\\\\P_f=\frac{mg}{A}\\##

I made this same mistake when I first did it in my head. I had to write it out before I realized that ##\frac{mg}{A}## is the pressure increase (caused by the sand).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: rpthomps
  • #17
Mister T said:
I made this same mistake when I first did it in my head. I had to write it out before I realized that ##\frac{mg}{A}## is the pressure increase (caused by the sand).
Don't you think it would have been better for rpthomps if he had been given the opportunity to deduce this himself?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: rpthomps
  • #18
Chestermiller said:
Your answer for Pf in terms of mg is incorrect. You left something out. What is it that you think you might have omitted from the equation?

Chet

Is there some kind of normal force that is present before the sand is on? This would be equivalent to ##P_i\times A## The sand adds mg to this downward force which is balanced by ##P_f\times A##. Solving for m gives me the expression at the back of the text. I have a real difficulty seeing this. I just assumed the weight of the sand was equivalent to the pressure of the gas. Thanks again for all your help!
 
  • #19
rpthomps said:
Is there some kind of normal force that is present before the sand is on? This would be equivalent to ##P_i\times A## The sand adds mg to this downward force which is balanced by ##P_f\times A##. Solving for m gives me the expression at the back of the text. I have a real difficulty seeing this. I just assumed the weight of the sand was equivalent to the pressure of the gas. Thanks again for all your help!
The words "initially in equilibrium with the surrounding air at temperature T and pressure P" in the problem statement means that the piston is initially in force equilibrium. Do a force balance on the piston before the sand is added, starting with a free body diagram. What are the forces acting on the massless piston initially? What is the force balance equation on the massless piston initially?

Chet
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: rpthomps
  • #20
Oh, it is the pressure of the air above it! :) Thank you so much sir!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Chestermiller

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K