First-Order Perturbation Theory Derivation in Griffiths

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the derivation of first-order perturbation theory as presented in Griffiths's quantum mechanics textbook. The key claim is that the expression <\psi^0|H^0\psi^1> = holds true, where H^0 represents the unperturbed Hamiltonian and \psi^0 and \psi^1 denote the unperturbed wavefunction and its first-order correction, respectively. A participant raises a concern regarding the assumption that \psi^1 is an eigenfunction of H^0, which is not guaranteed. The clarification provided emphasizes that the relation is valid for all states due to the Hermitian nature of the operator, not just for eigenstates.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles, particularly perturbation theory.
  • Familiarity with Hermitian operators and their properties.
  • Knowledge of eigenfunctions and eigenvalues in quantum mechanics.
  • Basic grasp of the concepts presented in Griffiths's "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics".
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of first-order perturbation theory in Griffiths's "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics".
  • Explore the properties of Hermitian operators and their implications in quantum mechanics.
  • Learn about the role of eigenstates and non-eigenstates in quantum mechanical systems.
  • Investigate examples of perturbation theory applications in various quantum systems.
USEFUL FOR

Students of quantum mechanics, particularly those studying perturbation theory, as well as educators and researchers seeking to clarify concepts related to Hermitian operators and wavefunction corrections.

BucketOfFish
Messages
60
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



On page 251 of Griffiths's quantum book, when deriving a result in first-order perturbation theory, the author makes the claim that &lt;\psi^0|H^0\psi^1&gt; = &lt;H^0\psi^0|\psi^1&gt; where H^0 is the unperturbed Hamiltonian and \psi^0 and \psi^1 are the unperturbed wavefunction and its first-order correction.

Homework Equations



H^0\psi^0=E^0\psi^0

The Attempt at a Solution



From the derivations I've seen of Hermitian operators, I seem to understand that both sides of the expression in the braket have to be eigenfunctions of the operator for the operator to be symmetric. If this is the case, then I feel that Griffiths's explanation may be lacking something, since there is no guarantee that the first-order wavefunction correction is an eigenfunction of the unperturbed Hamiltonian. In this case, you could not switch the Hamiltonian operator around like this.

I must be misunderstanding something! Can someone help me clear this up?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
That relation must hold for all states, not just eigenstates, if the operator is Hermitian.
 
Ah yes, I forgot that observables are not just for stationary states. Thanks for your help, vela!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K