1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

First-Order Perturbation Theory Derivation in Griffiths

  1. Jan 17, 2013 #1
    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data

    On page 251 of Griffiths's quantum book, when deriving a result in first-order perturbation theory, the author makes the claim that [tex]<\psi^0|H^0\psi^1> = <H^0\psi^0|\psi^1>[/tex] where [itex]H^0[/itex] is the unperturbed Hamiltonian and [itex]\psi^0[/itex] and [itex]\psi^1[/itex] are the unperturbed wavefunction and its first-order correction.

    2. Relevant equations

    [tex]H^0\psi^0=E^0\psi^0[/tex]

    3. The attempt at a solution

    From the derivations I've seen of Hermitian operators, I seem to understand that both sides of the expression in the braket have to be eigenfunctions of the operator for the operator to be symmetric. If this is the case, then I feel that Griffiths's explanation may be lacking something, since there is no guarantee that the first-order wavefunction correction is an eigenfunction of the unperturbed Hamiltonian. In this case, you could not switch the Hamiltonian operator around like this.

    I must be misunderstanding something! Can someone help me clear this up?
     
    Last edited: Jan 17, 2013
  2. jcsd
  3. Jan 17, 2013 #2

    vela

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Education Advisor

    That relation must hold for all states, not just eigenstates, if the operator is Hermitian.
     
  4. Jan 17, 2013 #3
    Ah yes, I forgot that observables are not just for stationary states. Thanks for your help, vela!
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: First-Order Perturbation Theory Derivation in Griffiths
Loading...