MHB Flagpole Angle: 40 Degrees - What's 3/4 of the Way Up?

  • Thread starter Thread starter oldfart1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Angle Degrees
oldfart1
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
a flagpole subtends a angle of 40 degrees.
What angle does it subten 3/4 of the way up.
Answer is supposedly 32 degrees ,but how ?

oldfart
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Let $$y$$ be the height of the flagpole. Let $$x$$ be the distance from the base of the flagpole to the observer.
Then $$\tan(40^\circ)=\dfrac yx$$. Letting $$q$$ be the angle in question we have $$\tan(q)=\dfrac34\cdot\dfrac yx$$
Can you continue?
 
greg1313 said:
Let $$y$$ be the height of the flagpole. Let $$x$$ be the distance from the base of the flagpole to the observer.
Then $$\tan(40^\circ)=\dfrac yx$$. Letting $$q$$ be the angle in question we have $$\tan(q)=\dfrac34\cdot\dfrac yx$$
Can you continue?

Sorry but no. thanks
 
oldfart said:
Sorry but no. thanks

As Greg pointed out you have $$\tan(q) = \dfrac{3}{4} \cdot \dfrac{y}{x}$$ together with $$\tan(40^{\circ}) = \dfrac{y}{x}$$

That means you can put in $$\tan(40^{\circ})$$ (from the second equation) in place of [math]\dfrac{y}{x}[/math] from the first.

This substitution gives you $$\tan(q) = \dfrac{3}{4} \cdot \tan(40^{\circ})$$

The right hand side of that equation is simply a number your calculator can find for you. Does that make it clearer?
 
Thanks for your help..I get it
Oldfart
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top