Flagpole Height Calculation | FE Trig Problem 14

  • Thread starter Thread starter ratman720
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Trig
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on solving a flagpole height calculation problem using trigonometry, specifically the tangent function and the Law of Sines. The problem involves measuring angles of 37° 11' and 25° 43' from two different distances, with the user initially calculating the height as approximately 29.56 meters using tangents. However, the correct height, as per the book, is 22.43 meters, derived using the Law of Sines. The discrepancy arises from the user's misunderstanding of the relationship between the variables and the need to correctly apply trigonometric identities.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of trigonometric functions, specifically tangent and sine.
  • Familiarity with the Law of Sines in triangle calculations.
  • Basic algebra skills for rearranging equations.
  • Knowledge of angle measurement in degrees and minutes.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Law of Sines and its application in solving triangle problems.
  • Practice solving problems involving tangent functions in right triangles.
  • Learn how to convert between degrees and minutes for angle measurements.
  • Explore advanced trigonometric identities and their applications in engineering problems.
USEFUL FOR

Engineering students, particularly those preparing for the Fundamentals of Engineering (FE) exam, and professionals needing to apply trigonometric principles in real-world scenarios.

ratman720
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Im in the process of reviewing for my FE and found an online PDF of the older Lindeburg book while I wait for the new one. While running through the trig section review problems, I came to problem 14. Which is summarized as follows:

looking at the top of a flagpole you notice the angle of measurement is 37° 11', You move away 17m and the new angle to the top of the flag pole is 25°43'. How high is the flagpole.

The problem is on pg 70/71 of the .pdf which I have linked below.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/113765067/FE-Review-Manual-Lindeburg-2010 .

I chose to solve this using tangents. Ie x*tan(37°11')=(x+17)*tan(25°43'). its fairly simple rearrange the equation and solve. I come to a height of ~29.56 The answer in the book is found using the law of signs. and comes to 22.43. Of the available options both of our answers are closest to (B) at 22. Noting that the answer from the book is closer, I am curious if this is simply an issue with rounding, or whether there is a distinct reason why tangents can't be used for this.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
The answer to the problem is the height of the flagpole 'h', which is not the same as the value of 'x'.

And no, the difference between 29.56 and 22.43 could not be the result of rounding, even if you had correctly solved for the height of the flagpole.

BTW, it's the 'Law of Sines' for this problem. There is a different 'Law of Signs' used for finding out how many real roots a polynomial might have.
 
Using tangents I get ~22m for the height of the polel

Check your algebra.
 
You had two equations to solve,

\tan{(37^o11')}=\frac{h}{x}

\tan{(25^o43')}=\frac{h}{x+17}

which have two unknowns, hence it's obviously possible to find the value (or in some cases, possibly multiple values or no values) of x and h that satisfies the above equations. You've found the value of x, and now you just need to plug that x value back into either of the equations to find h.

Or alternatively, skip calculating x altogether by rearranging each equation to make x the subject, and then equate them

x=\frac{h}{\tan{(37^o11')}}

x=\frac{h}{\tan{(25^o43')}}-17
 
Ya I completely forgot to convert my solution for x over to h. Thanks.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
15K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
10K
Replies
11
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
10K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
9K
Replies
2
Views
650