Flawless Falcon Flight (SpaceX)

  • SpaceX
  • Thread starter 1oldman2
  • Start date

Answers and Replies

  • #2
1,448
1,204
:smile:
 
  • #7
mheslep
Gold Member
311
728
I see the video indicates the booster for raising geosynchronous mission hits the atmosphere twice as fast as a LEO mission, thus the booster has four times the energy, generating eight times the heat.
 
  • Like
Likes 1oldman2
  • #9
mheslep
Gold Member
311
728
Seems as if SpaceX should already know the max temperature encountered on return by the booster for this mission profile, and should thus be able predict booster reuseability, whether or not the booster lands succesfully. How many crispy boosters will they expensively retrieve only to be stored in a warehouse as opposed to the bottom of thee Atlantic?
 
  • #10
1,448
1,204
I expect a work around attempt very soon, they have a good learning curve.
 
  • #12
1,448
1,204
Curious about the condition of this booster, nice landing though. :ok:
 
  • #13
3,379
944
Good job.
Looks like the barge has to be designed to dissipate a lot of sudden heating and gas presure.
 
  • Like
Likes 1oldman2
  • #14
1,448
1,204
Good job.
Looks like the barge has to be designed to dissipate a lot of sudden heating and gas presure.
And likely a rocket crash from time to time. :wink:
 
  • #15
1,448
1,204
About 21 minutes into video is lift off, a nice flight.
:doh: The video link I posted earlier in this thread was from an earlier landing, sorry about that. This landing occurs at about 29 minutes into the tech broadcast.
 
Last edited:
  • #16
1,448
1,204
This is an engineering aspect I wasn't aware of.
"Touchdown was somewhat harder than previous landings, causing the ‘Contingency Crush Core’
to come into play to cushion the impact, a device Elon Musk describes as an “aluminum honeycomb for
energy absorption in the telescoping actuator.” This is a replaceable part giving Falcon 9 the ability to survive
corner-case landings at higher speeds. What implications the Crush Core actually crushing has on recovery operations
is unknown". (From- http://spaceflight101.com/thaicom-8-space-x-launch-success/ )
My favorite segment of the video was the view from the core booster at roughly 26-28 minutes, The video of that view ends with what appears to be a camera meltdown.
 
  • Like
Likes Hoophy
  • #17
CWatters
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
10,529
2,297
As I recall a similar honeycomb was used in the legs of the Apollo moon landers. I suspect it's just a matter of changing the shock absorber bit like you can do on a car.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes 1oldman2
  • #18
1,448
1,204
As I recall a similar honeycomb was used in thesuspension legs of the Apollo moon landers. I suspect it's just a matter of changing the shock absorber bit like you can do on a car.
Sure enough, there it is. In all the Apollo landings I have watched I had never considered the LM's suspension, thanks for pointing this out.

http://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/LM_Landing Gear1973010151.pdf
LM suspension.PNG

LM suspension 2.PNG
 
  • Like
Likes mheslep
  • #20
CWatters
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
10,529
2,297
Interesting, thanks.
 
  • Like
Likes 1oldman2

Related Threads on Flawless Falcon Flight (SpaceX)

  • Last Post
4
Replies
82
Views
8K
Replies
43
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • Last Post
8
Replies
182
Views
13K
Replies
35
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
921
Top