Fluid Flow Symmetry: Showing $\pi_b G^b$ is Constant

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on demonstrating that the expression \( u^a \nabla_{a} (\pi_b G^b) = 0 \) holds true under the conditions defined by the fluid flow symmetry. The variables involved include the entropy/baryon \( S \), temperature \( T \), one-form field \( u_a \), and chemical potential \( \mu \). The use of Killing's equation is suggested to simplify the problem, specifically to eliminate terms involving \( \nabla_a G_b \). The invariance of \( \pi \) under the symmetry transformation associated with the Killing vector \( G \) is also a critical aspect of the solution.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of fluid dynamics and symmetry in physics
  • Familiarity with Killing's equation in differential geometry
  • Knowledge of tensor calculus, particularly covariant derivatives
  • Basic concepts of thermodynamics, including entropy and chemical potential
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of Killing's equation in general relativity
  • Learn about the properties of covariant derivatives in tensor calculus
  • Explore the relationship between symmetry generators and conservation laws
  • Investigate the role of fluid dynamics in thermodynamic systems
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physicists, particularly those specializing in fluid dynamics, general relativity, and thermodynamics, as well as graduate students seeking to deepen their understanding of symmetry in physical systems.

ergospherical
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Education Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
1,100
Reaction score
1,387
I don't know where to start with this problem. If ##\pi_a = (\mu + TS) u_a## then show that \begin{align*}
u^a \nabla_{a} (\pi_b G^b) = 0
\end{align*}where the field ##G^a## is a symmetry generator. [##S## is entropy/baryon, ##T## is temperature, ##u_a## is a one-form field corresponding to a fluid-comoving observer and ##\mu## is chemical potential].
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What have you tried? Killing's equation?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ergospherical
How would I use Killing's equation here? The only thing I wrote down so far was ##L_{G} \pi = 0##, the statement of the invariance of ##\pi## under the symmetry transformation corresponding to the Killing vector ##G##, but I don't know how to obtain the target equation.
 
Did you expand out the left hand side? I think Killing’s equation will kill off some terms involving \nabla_a G_b. What remains may vanish due to other properties of, say, u^a that are implicit in your problem statement.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
9K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K