Fluid Flow Symmetry: Showing $\pi_b G^b$ is Constant

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around demonstrating that the expression \( u^a \nabla_{a} (\pi_b G^b) = 0 \) holds true, given the definition of \( \pi_a = (\mu + TS) u_a \). The context involves theoretical aspects of fluid dynamics and symmetry in the framework of general relativity, particularly focusing on the role of Killing vectors.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses uncertainty about how to start the problem and mentions the definition of \( \pi_a \).
  • Another participant suggests considering Killing's equation as a potential approach to the problem.
  • A subsequent post questions how to apply Killing's equation and notes the invariance of \( \pi \) under the symmetry transformation associated with the Killing vector \( G \).
  • Another participant advises expanding the left-hand side of the equation and suggests that Killing's equation may eliminate certain terms involving \( \nabla_a G_b \), with the possibility that remaining terms vanish due to properties of \( u^a \).

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not appear to reach a consensus on the method to solve the problem, with multiple approaches and uncertainties expressed regarding the application of Killing's equation and the implications of the properties of the involved terms.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations regarding the assumptions made about the properties of the fields involved, particularly \( u^a \) and \( G^b \), as well as the implications of Killing's equation that remain unresolved.

ergospherical
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Education Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
1,100
Reaction score
1,387
I don't know where to start with this problem. If ##\pi_a = (\mu + TS) u_a## then show that \begin{align*}
u^a \nabla_{a} (\pi_b G^b) = 0
\end{align*}where the field ##G^a## is a symmetry generator. [##S## is entropy/baryon, ##T## is temperature, ##u_a## is a one-form field corresponding to a fluid-comoving observer and ##\mu## is chemical potential].
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What have you tried? Killing's equation?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ergospherical
How would I use Killing's equation here? The only thing I wrote down so far was ##L_{G} \pi = 0##, the statement of the invariance of ##\pi## under the symmetry transformation corresponding to the Killing vector ##G##, but I don't know how to obtain the target equation.
 
Did you expand out the left hand side? I think Killing’s equation will kill off some terms involving \nabla_a G_b. What remains may vanish due to other properties of, say, u^a that are implicit in your problem statement.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
9K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K