A Fluid Flow Symmetry: Showing $\pi_b G^b$ is Constant

Click For Summary
To show that \( u^a \nabla_{a} (\pi_b G^b) = 0 \), the discussion centers on using Killing's equation and the invariance of \( \pi \) under the symmetry transformation associated with the Killing vector \( G \). The initial approach involves expressing \( \pi_a \) in terms of fluid dynamics variables, including entropy \( S \), temperature \( T \), and chemical potential \( \mu \). Participants suggest expanding the left-hand side of the equation and note that terms involving \( \nabla_a G_b \) may cancel out due to properties of the one-form field \( u_a \). The conversation emphasizes the need to carefully analyze the implications of symmetry and the characteristics of the fluid flow in the context of the problem.
ergospherical
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Education Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
1,100
Reaction score
1,387
I don't know where to start with this problem. If ##\pi_a = (\mu + TS) u_a## then show that \begin{align*}
u^a \nabla_{a} (\pi_b G^b) = 0
\end{align*}where the field ##G^a## is a symmetry generator. [##S## is entropy/baryon, ##T## is temperature, ##u_a## is a one-form field corresponding to a fluid-comoving observer and ##\mu## is chemical potential].
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What have you tried? Killing's equation?
 
  • Like
Likes ergospherical
How would I use Killing's equation here? The only thing I wrote down so far was ##L_{G} \pi = 0##, the statement of the invariance of ##\pi## under the symmetry transformation corresponding to the Killing vector ##G##, but I don't know how to obtain the target equation.
 
Did you expand out the left hand side? I think Killing’s equation will kill off some terms involving \nabla_a G_b. What remains may vanish due to other properties of, say, u^a that are implicit in your problem statement.
 
Hello, everyone, hope someone will resolve my doubts. I have posted here some two years ago asking for an explanation of the Lorentz transforms derivation found in the Einstein 1905 paper. The answer I got seemed quite satisfactory. Two years after I revisit this derivation and this is what I see. In the Einstein original paper, the Lorentz transforms derivation included as a premise that light is always propagated along the direction perpendicular to the line of motion when viewed from the...