A Fluid Flow Symmetry: Showing $\pi_b G^b$ is Constant

Click For Summary
To show that \( u^a \nabla_{a} (\pi_b G^b) = 0 \), the discussion centers on using Killing's equation and the invariance of \( \pi \) under the symmetry transformation associated with the Killing vector \( G \). The initial approach involves expressing \( \pi_a \) in terms of fluid dynamics variables, including entropy \( S \), temperature \( T \), and chemical potential \( \mu \). Participants suggest expanding the left-hand side of the equation and note that terms involving \( \nabla_a G_b \) may cancel out due to properties of the one-form field \( u_a \). The conversation emphasizes the need to carefully analyze the implications of symmetry and the characteristics of the fluid flow in the context of the problem.
ergospherical
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Education Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
1,100
Reaction score
1,387
I don't know where to start with this problem. If ##\pi_a = (\mu + TS) u_a## then show that \begin{align*}
u^a \nabla_{a} (\pi_b G^b) = 0
\end{align*}where the field ##G^a## is a symmetry generator. [##S## is entropy/baryon, ##T## is temperature, ##u_a## is a one-form field corresponding to a fluid-comoving observer and ##\mu## is chemical potential].
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What have you tried? Killing's equation?
 
  • Like
Likes ergospherical
How would I use Killing's equation here? The only thing I wrote down so far was ##L_{G} \pi = 0##, the statement of the invariance of ##\pi## under the symmetry transformation corresponding to the Killing vector ##G##, but I don't know how to obtain the target equation.
 
Did you expand out the left hand side? I think Killing’s equation will kill off some terms involving \nabla_a G_b. What remains may vanish due to other properties of, say, u^a that are implicit in your problem statement.
 
Moderator's note: Spin-off from another thread due to topic change. In the second link referenced, there is a claim about a physical interpretation of frame field. Consider a family of observers whose worldlines fill a region of spacetime. Each of them carries a clock and a set of mutually orthogonal rulers. Each observer points in the (timelike) direction defined by its worldline's tangent at any given event along it. What about the rulers each of them carries ? My interpretation: each...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
3K
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
5K