Fluid mechanics (shape of free surface)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the proof that the shape of the free surface of a fluid in a rotating tube is parabolic. The problem involves a vertical tube of radius 'R' and height 'H', filled with fluid to a height 'h' (where h < H) and rotated with an angular velocity 'w'. Participants explore the validity of the proposition that the initial height of the fluid is the arithmetic mean of the maximum and minimum heights of the fluid, with suggestions to use integration to calculate the volume of fluid above and below the original level.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of fluid mechanics principles
  • Knowledge of calculus, particularly integration
  • Familiarity with the concept of angular velocity
  • Ability to visualize and interpret parabolic shapes in a cylindrical coordinate system
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the parabolic shape of free surfaces in rotating fluids
  • Learn about the application of integration in calculating volumes in cylindrical coordinates
  • Explore the relationship between angular velocity and fluid behavior in rotating systems
  • Investigate the principles of hydrostatics and their application to fluid dynamics
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics and engineering, particularly those focusing on fluid mechanics and dynamics, as well as anyone involved in the study of rotating systems and their effects on fluid behavior.

Mandeep Deka
Messages
103
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A tube of radius 'R' and height 'H' (placed vertically), is filled with a fluid till a height 'h' (<H). Now it is rotated with an angular velocity 'w' about the central axis. Prove that the shape of the free surface is parabolic.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


The proof of this equation is simple, and i have derived it. Now along with this question a statement was mentioned, which i aint able to prove.

Is is said that the initial height of the fluid is the arithmetic mean of the maximum height (i.e the height of the fluid at the end of the tube) and the minimum height (i.e the height of the fluid at the center). I have tried, but failed to prove it. Is the proposition valid?
If yes, I would be grateful if someone could give me some hint as to how i prove it!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You will probably want to draw the radial cross-section with the parabola and the original water level crossing it. The volume of water above the original water level at the edges should equal the volume "missing" below it in the center.
 
exactly, but how do i do it?
That's what i am asking, How will i calculate the volume of water above and below the original level?
 
well you integrate your equation for the shape of the free surface from +R/2 to -R/2 and it should give 0 if you have placed the origin of the graph at (R/2,h) in the cylinder frame
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
3K