Fluid mechanics (shape of free surface)

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a fluid-filled tube that is rotated, and the task is to demonstrate that the shape of the free surface of the fluid becomes parabolic. Additionally, there is a statement regarding the initial height of the fluid being the arithmetic mean of the maximum and minimum heights that is under scrutiny.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to prove a relationship involving the initial height of the fluid and its maximum and minimum heights but expresses difficulty in doing so. Some participants suggest visualizing the problem through a radial cross-section and considering the volume of fluid above and below the original level.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring different approaches to understanding the volume calculations related to the fluid's surface shape. There is no explicit consensus yet, but suggestions for drawing diagrams and integrating equations have been made to aid in the exploration.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the complexities of the problem, particularly regarding the validity of the proposition about the arithmetic mean and the necessary calculations for volume. The original poster's request for hints indicates a need for further clarification on these points.

Mandeep Deka
Messages
103
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A tube of radius 'R' and height 'H' (placed vertically), is filled with a fluid till a height 'h' (<H). Now it is rotated with an angular velocity 'w' about the central axis. Prove that the shape of the free surface is parabolic.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


The proof of this equation is simple, and i have derived it. Now along with this question a statement was mentioned, which i aint able to prove.

Is is said that the initial height of the fluid is the arithmetic mean of the maximum height (i.e the height of the fluid at the end of the tube) and the minimum height (i.e the height of the fluid at the center). I have tried, but failed to prove it. Is the proposition valid?
If yes, I would be grateful if someone could give me some hint as to how i prove it!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You will probably want to draw the radial cross-section with the parabola and the original water level crossing it. The volume of water above the original water level at the edges should equal the volume "missing" below it in the center.
 
exactly, but how do i do it?
That's what i am asking, How will i calculate the volume of water above and below the original level?
 
well you integrate your equation for the shape of the free surface from +R/2 to -R/2 and it should give 0 if you have placed the origin of the graph at (R/2,h) in the cylinder frame
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
3K