Fluid motion in venturi flowmeter

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the volume flow rate of water using a venturi flowmeter in a solar collector system. The flowmeter has an inlet diameter of 1.9 cm and a venturi diameter of 0.64 cm, with a manometer containing oil of density 0.82 times that of water. The calculated flow rate is 1.5 x 10-5 m3/sec, while the book states the answer is 7.2 cm3/sec, leading to a query about potential errors in the calculations. The calculations utilize the Bernoulli equation and the continuity equation, confirming the methodology is sound.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Bernoulli's equation
  • Knowledge of fluid dynamics principles
  • Familiarity with the continuity equation
  • Basic skills in unit conversion and dimensional analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the principles of Bernoulli's equation in fluid mechanics
  • Learn about the design and function of venturi flowmeters
  • Study the effects of fluid density on flow rate calculations
  • Explore online calculators for fluid dynamics and their limitations
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in engineering, particularly those focused on fluid mechanics, as well as anyone involved in the design and analysis of flow measurement systems.

vladimir69
Messages
124
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The venturi flowmeter is used to measure the flow rate of water in a solar collector system. The flowmeter is inserted in a pipe with diameter 1.9cm; at the venturi of the flowmeter the diameter is reduced to 0.64cm. The manometer tube contains oil with density 0.82 times that of water. If the difference in oil levels on the two sides of the manometer tube is 1.4cm, what is the volume flow rate?

Homework Equations


P+\frac{1}{2}\rho v^2 +\rho g h = constant

vA=constant

P=P_{0} + \rho g h

The Attempt at a Solution


P_{i}= pressure in the pipe where the diameter is d_{i}
v_{i}= speed of water where the pressure is P_{i}
d_{1} = 0.019
d_{2} = 0.0064
\rho_{w} is the density of water
\rho_{oil} is the density of oil
H=0.014 is the height difference of oil

Firstly I neglected the potential energy component to obtain

P_{1} + \frac{1}{2} \rho_{w} v_{1}^2 = P_{2} + \frac{1}{2} \rho_{w} v_{2}^2

v_{1}A_{1} = v_{2} A_{2}

where

A_{i} = \frac{1}{4}\pi d_{i}^2

and

P_{1}-P_{2}=\rho_{oil} g H

popping this into the mix gets

\rho_{oil} g H + \frac{1}{2} \rho_{w} v_{1}^2 = \frac{1}{2} \rho_{w} v_{2}^2

\rho_{oil} g H + \frac{1}{2} \rho_{w} v_{2}^2\frac{A_{2}^2}{A_{1}^2}- \frac{1}{2} \rho_{w} v_{2}^2=0

\frac{1}{2}\rho_{w}v_{2}^2(1-\frac{A_{2}^2}{A_{1}^2})=\rho_{oil} g H

v_{2}=\sqrt{\frac{\rho_{oil}}{\rho_{w}}\frac{2gH}{(1-\frac{d_{2}^4}{d_{1}^4})}}

v_{2} = 0.4774

then the volume flow rate is just

v_{2}A_{2} = 0.4774 * \frac{1}{4}\pi 0.0064^2 = 1.5 \times 10^{-5} m^3 / sec

The book gives an answer of 7.2 cm^3 /sec. Where did I go wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Weird, your calculations seem good to me. I even checked them with an online calculator:

http://www.efunda.com/formulae/fluids/venturi_flowmeter.cfm#calc

Was there any information in the problem statement about loss of flow after the meter? Though I doubt that is the problem, you'd need to lose about 1/2 the velocity or 3/4 of the kinetic energy in order to get the book answer; and venturi tubes are designed to be low-loss.

p.s. if you use the above online calculator, they will let you try it one time, and after that ask for a login. However, I found that deleting the efunda.com cookie on my computer allowed me to use the calculator a 2nd time.
 
thanks for checking for me
as for the problem statement, i just checked and its been copied word for word from the book (minus a diagram)

regards,
vladimir
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K