Graduate For finite dimension vector spaces, all norms are equivalent

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the equivalence of norms in finite-dimensional vector spaces, specifically the relationship defined by the inequalities mρ(x) ≤ ||x|| ≤ Mρ(x). Participants clarify that this relationship implies the norms are equivalent in the sense that they yield the same topological properties, such as convergence and boundedness, despite potentially differing numerical values for specific vectors. The current Wikipedia definition is referenced, which states that equivalent norms exist if the aforementioned bounds hold. It is emphasized that while norms may differ quantitatively, they are qualitatively the same in terms of their topological implications. The conclusion drawn is that equivalent norms lead to identical norm topologies.
ShayanJ
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
2,801
Reaction score
606
I searched for a proof of the statement in the title and found this document. But it just proves that for two norms ## \rho(x) ## and ## ||x|| ##, we have ## m\rho(x)\leq ||x|| \leq M \rho(x) ## for some m and M. But how does it imply that the two norms are equivalent?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What do you mean by equivalence of norms? ##mρ(x)≤||x||≤Mρ(x)## implies ##M^{-1} ||x|| \leq ρ(x) \leq m^{-1} ||x||##.
 
I assume it means all of them give the same number for the same vector.
 
Shayan.J said:
But how does it imply that the two norms are equivalent?

I notice the current Wikipedia article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norm_(mathematics) simply defines "equivalent" to mean the existence of that bound.

To me, it would be nicer to define "equivalent" to mean something like "A sequence converges in one of the norms if and only if it converges in the other norm. It that an obvious consequence of the bound ?
 
  • Like
Likes ShayanJ
Shayan.J said:
I assume it means all of them give the same number for the same vector.
This cannot be since e.g. ##||(v_1,v_2)||_2 = \sqrt{v_1^2+v_2^2} \neq \max\{|v_1|,|v_2|\} = ||(v_1,v_2)||_\infty##.
It only means the two (four) relations above, i.e. it is qualitatively the same, not quantitatively.
 
Stephen Tashi said:
It that an obvious consequence of the bound ?
Yeah, It makes sense to me.
But isn't there a standard definition of equivalent norms?
fresh_42 said:
It only means the two (four) relations above, i.e. it is qualitative the same, not quantitative.
What do you mean by qualitatively the same?
 
Shayan.J said:
What do you mean by qualitatively the same?
What Stephen has said. Switching between equivalent norms doesn't change the general behavior of convergence, boundedness and so on, it only changes numbers: the quantity, not the quality.
 
  • Like
Likes ShayanJ
Stephen Tashi said:
I notice the current Wikipedia article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norm_(mathematics) simply defines "equivalent" to mean the existence of that bound.
Indeed. Two norms are equivalent if, by definition, the estimate given in the OP holds.

As you can easily show, this implies that for every ##x \in X## every open ##\rho##-ball centered at ##x## contains an open ##\|\cdot\|##-ball centered at ##x## and vice versa. Since these balls form bases for the norm topologies generated by ##\rho## and ##\|\cdot\|##, respectively, we conclude that the two norm topologies are identical.

In this sense equivalent norms are "qualitatively the same".
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
877
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K