For what values y is y(t) increasing/decreasing?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Duderonimous
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on determining the intervals for which the function y(t) is increasing or decreasing based on the first derivative y' = y³ - y² - 12y. Participants clarify that to find these intervals, one must analyze the sign of y' rather than relying solely on the second derivative. The correct factorization of y' leads to critical points at y = -3 and y = 4, which are essential for identifying the behavior of the function. The consensus is that the second derivative is not necessary for this specific inquiry.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of first and second derivatives
  • Familiarity with polynomial factorization
  • Knowledge of critical points and their significance in calculus
  • Ability to analyze the sign of a function to determine intervals of increase and decrease
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of critical points in calculus
  • Learn about the first derivative test for increasing and decreasing functions
  • Explore polynomial factorization techniques in depth
  • Investigate the relationship between derivatives and the behavior of functions
USEFUL FOR

Students studying calculus, particularly those focusing on differential equations and function analysis, as well as educators seeking to clarify concepts related to increasing and decreasing functions.

Duderonimous
Messages
63
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



y'=y^{3}-y^{2}-12y

For what values of y is y(t) increasing and for what values is it decreasing?

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I think you take the second derivative and equal it to zero to figure out the inflection pints right and then I am not so sure from there.

y''=3y^{2}-2y-12

0=3y^{2}-2y-12

Quadratic formula

y=\frac{2\pm2\sqrt{37}}{6}

Am I correct in this approach? I don't think I am.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Duderonimous said:

Homework Statement



y'=y^{3}-y^{2}-12y

For what values of y is y(t) increasing and for what values is it decreasing?
For y to be either increasing or decreasing, you just need to look at whether y' is positive or negative, so the original equation gets you half-way there already - no need to differentiate again.

Try to factorize the RHS and it should become clear.
 
You also need to take y''. Solving for y' = 0 just gets you the values of y for which the slope is zero. To also learn whether those points are (relative) minima or maxima requires taking y'' and substituting the values of y for which y' = 0.

Yes, factor by all means.
 
rude man said:
You also need to take y''. Solving for y' = 0 just gets you the values of y for which the slope is zero. To also learn whether those points are (relative) minima or maxima requires taking y'' and substituting the values of y for which y' = 0.

Yes, factor by all means.
Rubbish.
 
oay said:
Rubbish.

I say! I think you're right!
 
Last edited:
Odd that oay should be ruder than rude man and then rude man agrees with him! But oay is right- the second derivative is irrelevant. You are NOT asked to find "inflection points".

y'= y3- y2- 12y= y(y2- y- 12)= y(y- 4)(y+ 3), then if y< -3, all three factors are negative so y' is negative. If -3< y< 0 then y+3 is positive while y and y= 4 are both negative so y' is positive, etc.

But you would still need to find what values of t give those values of y.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I agree with hallsofivy. When you're wrong... admit it! And I do.
 
HallsofIvy said:
But you would still need to find what values of t give those values of y.
Finding values of t wasn't in the question, though.
rude man said:
I agree with hallsofivy. When you're wrong... admit it! And I do.
And I apologize for my sharp reply of "Rubbish". I think I'd just had a bottle of Chardonnay. :redface:
 
oay said:
Finding values of t wasn't in the question, though.

And I apologize for my sharp reply of "Rubbish". I think I'd just had a bottle of Chardonnay. :redface:

No apology required! It was just that.
 
  • #10
rude man said:
No apology required! It was just that.

Apt comment gracefully accepted and, shall I say, "wittily" replied to. I worry a lot less about rudeness when replying to somebody with 1600+ posts under their belt. I assume that's made them at least a little bit thick skinned. Nice exchange. I don't think there was any real rudeness intended and better yet, none recieved.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
958
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K