Force Calculation: Incorrect Result

  • Thread starter Thread starter Alexandra Fabiello
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Calculation Force
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the work done on a jet fighter during its launch from an aircraft carrier. Initially, the user incorrectly calculated force instead of work, using the formula for force with kinetic energy and distance. It was clarified that the correct approach involves using the change in kinetic energy to determine work done, not force. The user acknowledged the mistake and confirmed that the correct understanding resolved the issue. The focus remains on the distinction between work and force in the context of physics problems.
Alexandra Fabiello
Messages
42
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
Jet fighter planes are launched from aircraft carriers with the aid of their own engines and a catapult. If in the process of being launched from rest, the thrust of a jet's engines is 2.10 * 10^5 N and after moving through a distance of 90 m the plane lifts off with a kinetic energy of 4.20 * 10^7 J, what is the work done on the jet by the catapult?
Relevant Equations
Work total = change in kinetic energy
force = change in kinetic energy / change in distance
force = 4.2e7 J/90 m = 466666.6667 N
this minus 2.10e5 = 2.57e5 N rounded
This is incorrect, so I'm probably missing a formula or something.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Alexandra Fabiello said:
Homework Statement: Jet fighter planes are launched from aircraft carriers with the aid of their own engines and a catapult. If in the process of being launched from rest, the thrust of a jet's engines is 2.10 * 10^5 N and after moving through a distance of 90 m the plane lifts off with a kinetic energy of 4.20 * 10^7 J, what is the work done on the jet by the catapult?
Homework Equations: Work total = change in kinetic energy
force = change in kinetic energy / change in distance

force = 4.2e7 J/90 m = 466666.6667 N
this minus 2.10e5 = 2.57e5 N rounded
This is incorrect, so I'm probably missing a formula or something.
You are asked for the work done, not the force.
 
haruspex said:
You are asked for the work done, not the force.

Whoops, I mixed up 'change in kinetic energy' with force somehow.

Thanks, that worked!
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top