Force components acting on an airfoil

In summary, the conversation discusses the equations for lift and drag on an airfoil, with a focus on the proper sign conventions for the components. After some back and forth, it is determined that the first formula for lift is correct, while the second formula for drag needs to have its sign changed. The conversation also touches on the different conventions for representing lift and drag forces in diagrams and the importance of understanding and converting between different coordinate systems.
  • #1
FEAnalyst
336
137
TL;DR Summary
Are these formulas for lift and drag correct ?
Hi,

I have a simple question but I want to be 100% sure that my reasoning is correct. Take a look at this picture showing forces acting on an airfoil:

airfoil forces.PNG

Green forces (X and Y components) are known from CFD software but I need the values of blue components (lift and drag). Of course for zero angle of attack they will be equal to each other but I need formulas for nonzero angle. In the literature I've found the following equation for lift: $$F_{L}=F_{X} \sin{\alpha} - F_{Y} \cos{\alpha}$$ From this I figured out the formula for drag: $$F_{D}=F_{X} \cos{\alpha} + F_{Y} \sin{\alpha}$$ Are these equations correct ? If not then how they should look like ?

Thanks in advance for your help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Y axis should be inverted in diagram above for equation you provide to be correct.
 
  • Like
Likes FactChecker
  • #3
It's always the part that one is most confident about that turns out to be wrong. So be careful of any "of course" statements. :>)
 
  • #4
Thanks for reply. Is the first formula (for lift) correct and second one (for drag) wrong ? Could you tell me what should be changed ? Only sign so that it becomes ##F_{D}=F_{X} \cos{\alpha}- F_{Y} \sin{\alpha}## ?
 
  • #5
Either change your diagram or change every sign of ##F_Y## in your equations.

PS. Always test the cases of ##\alpha=0## and ##\alpha=90## to make sure that your sign convention is correct.
 
  • Like
Likes FEAnalyst and trurle
  • #6
So, just to make sure, for the diagram I attached to my first post the correct formulas are: ##F_{L}=F_{X} \sin{\alpha}+ F_{Y} \cos{\alpha}## and ##F_{D}=F_{X} \cos{\alpha}- F_{Y} \sin{\alpha}##, right ?
 
  • #7
Looks good to me.
 
  • #8
Thank you very much. Apparently there was an error in the article where I’ve found the first formula which confused me and I couldn’t figure out how to derive it.
 
  • #9
FEAnalyst said:
Thank you very much. Apparently there was an error in the article where I’ve found the first formula which confused me and I couldn’t figure out how to derive it.
Any time you get such an equation from a different source, the chances are good that they do not use the same coordinates and sign convention. So you must make the appropriate conversions.
 
  • #10
The vectors should be drawn to scale. That will make things easier to visualize and allow you to check your work.
 
  • #11
My understanding is that, irrespective of the shape or angle of attack of the wing, lift is a force at right angles to the wind and drag is a force in line with the wind. That is different to the diagram.
 
  • Like
Likes FactChecker
  • #12
tech99 said:
My understanding is that, irrespective of the shape or angle of attack of the wing, lift is a force at right angles to the wind and drag is a force in line with the wind. That is different to the diagram.

That's interesting aspect. Some diagrams show lift and drag as always vertical and horizontal, irrespective of the angle of attack (like green vectors on my drawing). But others show these forces as parallel and perpendicular to chord line (like blue vectors on my drawing). For example:

https://www.grc.nasa.gov/www/k-12/airplane/climb.html

The definition of drag is force acting opposite to velocity vector which follows chord line changing for different angles of attack. This would suggest that the second way of representing forces acting on airfoil is correct. Lift definition is less clear in this sense. On the other hand it seems that most diagrams follow the first approach. Thus I'm confused which way is correct.
 
  • #13
FEAnalyst said:
That's interesting aspect. Some diagrams show lift and drag as always vertical and horizontal, irrespective of the angle of attack (like green vectors on my drawing). But others show these forces as parallel and perpendicular to chord line (like blue vectors on my drawing). For example:

https://www.grc.nasa.gov/www/k-12/airplane/climb.html

The definition of drag is force acting opposite to velocity vector which follows chord line changing for different angles of attack. This would suggest that the second way of representing forces acting on airfoil is correct. Lift definition is less clear in this sense. On the other hand it seems that most diagrams follow the first approach. Thus I'm confused which way is correct.
The NASA diagram is of a plane in a climb, so the actual direction of motion is not horizontal. In the text, they define lift and drag as "aerodynamic forces relative to the flight path".

One must be aware that different axis systems may be used and preferred by different specialists. Stability and control people like the wind axis. Others may prefer the body axis. Appropriate conversions are necessary. That being said, the term "lift" should probably be reserved only for the wind axis while something like ##-F_z## used to denote upward force in the body axis (z is often positive down).
 
  • #14
It seems to me more logical to refer lift and drag to the wind direction. The "aerofoil" might not be a wing - it could be an irregular object such as a building, or a golf ball, where we have no chord to refer to.
If we refer to the chord of the wing, it becomes difficult when the aeroplane has sink and glide angle.
Further, it is messy if lift and drag are not at right angles and if lift is not in line with weight.
I have found that for sailing vessels, where we do not have a simple aerofoil, to refer everything to the wind makes the understanding so much easier, and allows simpe explanation of leeway (equivalent to glide angle for an aeroplane).
 
  • #15
tech99 said:
It seems to me more logical to refer lift and drag to the wind direction. The "aerofoil" might not be a wing - it could be an irregular object such as a building, or a golf ball, where we have no chord to refer to.
Eventually, one is usually interested in the forces in terms of other coordinates anyway. So conversions are necessary.
If we refer to the chord of the wing, it becomes difficult when the aeroplane has sink and glide angle.
Further, it is messy if lift and drag are not at right angles and if lift is not in line with weight.
If there is a sink rate, then the wind axis does not line up with the Earth axis anyway and lift is not in line with weight. The same can be said if there is any roll angle.
That being said, the wind axis is as good as any and better (i.e. more convenient) for aerodynamics and wind tunnel work.
 
Last edited:

1. What are the different forces acting on an airfoil?

The main forces acting on an airfoil are lift, drag, weight, and thrust. Lift is the force that acts perpendicular to the direction of motion and is responsible for keeping the airfoil in the air. Drag is the force acting opposite to the direction of motion, caused by the resistance of the air. Weight is the force acting downwards due to the gravitational pull. Thrust is the force that propels the airfoil forward.

2. How do these forces affect the performance of an airfoil?

The balance and interaction of these forces determine the overall performance of an airfoil. Lift and drag directly affect the aerodynamic efficiency and stability of the airfoil, while weight and thrust influence the speed and direction of the airfoil.

3. What is the relationship between the angle of attack and force components on an airfoil?

The angle of attack refers to the angle between the airfoil and the direction of the oncoming airflow. As the angle of attack increases, the lift force also increases, while the drag force also increases until it reaches a critical point where the airfoil stalls. At this point, the lift decreases and the drag increases significantly.

4. How does the shape of an airfoil affect the force components?

The shape of an airfoil, including its curvature and thickness, plays a crucial role in determining the force components acting on it. A thicker airfoil will produce more lift, while a thinner airfoil will have less drag. The curvature of the airfoil also affects the lift and drag forces, with a more curved airfoil producing more lift but also more drag.

5. What factors can affect the force components acting on an airfoil?

The force components acting on an airfoil can be affected by several factors, including the shape and size of the airfoil, the angle of attack, the speed and density of the airflow, and the viscosity of the air. Other external factors such as wind gusts and turbulence can also impact the force components on an airfoil.

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • Aerospace Engineering
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
21
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • Aerospace Engineering
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
20
Views
384
  • Aerospace Engineering
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
999
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
17
Views
891
Back
Top