Force from a Kinetic Energy Function

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around deriving force from a kinetic energy function, specifically when the kinetic energy is expressed as a function of time rather than position. Participants explore the relationship between kinetic energy and force, questioning how to apply known principles of energy to this context.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss whether the kinetic energy function is dependent on time or position, and how this affects the derivation of force. There are attempts to clarify the relationship between force and energy, with some suggesting that force is the derivative of energy with respect to distance. Others explore the implications of using kinetic energy in place of potential energy.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with various interpretations being explored. Some participants have provided insights into the mathematical relationships involved, while others have pointed out the need for caution regarding assumptions about energy functions. There is no explicit consensus yet, but several productive lines of reasoning have emerged.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the complexity introduced by having a kinetic energy function that depends on time, as opposed to position, which may influence the application of energy conservation principles.

Dustinc
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Say you're given a function that represents the kinetic energy of some object, what would you have to do to derive the force from that function? I know that for motion along a straight line a conservative force F(x) is the negative derivative of its associated potential energy function U, but what is there to do if the function is one of kinetic energy?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is your given KE function a function of time or position? That is, do you have KE(t) or KE(x)?
 
I would phrase it a little differently! Rather than the force being "caused" by the energy, the force is what causes a change in energy. And specifically, the force that causes a change in energy is equal to the rate of change of the energy with respect to distance. In special cases, for example lifting a constant weight a fixed distance, that means dividing the change in energy (change in potential energy) by the distance. In more general cases, the force is the derivative of the energy function with respect to distance.

If, as gneil suggests, the energy is a function of time, t, use dE/dx= (dE/dt)(dt/dx)= (1/v)(dE/dt)
 
The kinetic energy function is a function of time, my apologies!
 
If, as stated in post #1, the issue is having a kinetic energy function instead of a potential energy function - they you cannot use the force-PE relation directly. Instead you should use the relationship between PE and KE (conservation of energy perhaps?) to get a force-KE relation for your situation.

Having KE(t) instead of KE(x) is an additional complication dealt with above.
 
KE(t)

I get the same result as HallsofIvy, by a different route:

KE = ½mv² ,
so d(KE)/dt = mv(dv/dt) = (ma)v = Fv

therefore F = (1/v)d(KE)/dt ... (eq'n A)

and d(KE)/dx = mv(dv/dx) = mv(dv/dt)(dt/dx) = m(dv/dt) = ma = F ,
because dt/dx is the reciprocal of v

so d(KE)/dt = (1/v)d(KE)/dt , from eq'n A
 
You can also do: $$K=\frac{p^2}{2m}\\ \Rightarrow \frac{d}{dt}K = \frac{p}{m}\frac{dp}{dt} = \frac{p}{m}F = vF$$... because ##F=dp/dt##

If you do: ##K+U=\text{constant}## ... then take the gradient - the 1D case comes out:
$$\frac{dK}{dx} = -\frac{dU}{dx} = F$$... which takes you to the same place by using HallsofIvy's post.

Though I notice this is the "homework" section ... technically Dustinc should have been working all this out.
I still think there are details that will depend on the specific situation in the specific problem.
 
LioNiNoiL said:
so d(KE)/dt = (1/v)d(KE)/dt , from eq'n A
That should be (of course)
d(KE)/dx = (1/v)d(KE)/dt

Mistakes happen after a long day.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K