Force on a Charged Bead Near a Line Charge

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves calculating the force on a charged bead located near a uniformly charged line (a glass rod). The rod has a positive charge, while the bead carries a negative charge. The setup includes specific distances and charge values.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the integration needed to find the total force on the bead, with one participant mentioning the equivalence of the two halves of the rod for simplification. There is also a suggestion to clarify the initial steps and the use of distance elements in the equations.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants questioning the initial setup and suggesting alternative approaches. Some guidance has been offered regarding the use of distance elements in the equations, but no consensus has been reached on the next steps.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of needing to integrate and a potential misunderstanding regarding the use of charge elements versus distance elements in the calculations. The specific details of the integration process and the assumptions about the charge distribution are still under discussion.

lat3ralus65
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A 10-cm long thin glass rod is uniformly charged to +50 nC. A small plastic bead, charged to - 5.2 nC, is 4.1 cm from the center of the rod. What is the magnitude of the force on the bead?

Homework Equations


dF = (k dq)/r[tex]^{2}[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution


I've gotten to this point:

dF sin [tex]\theta[/tex] = k[tex]\lambda[/tex] * (dx/(h[tex]^{2}[/tex] + x[tex]^{2}[/tex])[tex]^{3/2}[/tex]) * (h/[tex]\sqrt{h^{2} + x^{2}}[/tex])

and I understand fairly well how and why. But now I have no idea where to go from here, aside from the fact that I have to integrate at some point. I know the two halves of the rod are equivalent so I can integrate from 0 to 5 and double (right?).

What do I do?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Last edited by a moderator:
Hootenanny said:
Furthermore, your initial equation should involve a distance element (dz), rather than a charge element (dq).
Isn't he using the line charge concept ? I guess so : dq = pdz, where the p denotes the charge per unit of distance.


marlon
 
marlon said:
Isn't he using the line charge concept ? I guess so : dq = pdz, where the p denotes the charge per unit of distance.


marlon
Now you mention it, yes it does :redface:. I'll go and put another coffee on...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
905
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K