Force on a point charge near a uniformly charged rod

AI Thread Summary
The equation for calculating the force on a point charge near a uniformly charged rod is incorrectly set up, confusing the constant length of the rod with the variable of integration. It is essential to keep these elements separate and to rewrite the integral accordingly. Contributions from the entire rod should be included, necessitating that the lower limit of integration starts at the left end of the rod. Participants encourage the use of LaTeX for posting equations to enhance clarity. The discussion emphasizes the importance of correctly setting up integrals in electrostatics problems.
athenad07
Messages
6
Reaction score
3
Homework Statement
The charge per unit length on the thin rod shown here is What is the electric force on the point charge q? (See the preceding problem.)
Relevant Equations
here are the solution that I calculated, and I use the equation that E field equal to Force among charges over charges, but it yield quit different answer than the correct answer.
Screenshot 2024-10-27 at 15.14.04.png
Screenshot 2024-10-27 at 15.15.41.png
IMG_9426.JPG
IMG_9427.JPG
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This equation is set up incorrectly.

Screen Shot 2024-10-27 at 2.41.08 PM.png

  1. You are confusing the constant length of the rod ##l## with the variable of integration ##x##. You should keep the two separate and rewrite the integral.
  2. You want to add contributions from the entire rod, so the lower limit should be at the left end of the rod.
We would appreciate if you used LaTeX to post equations. To learn how, click on the link "LaTwX Guide", lower left, just above "Attach files."

(Edited for typos.)
 
Last edited:
Okay! I will next time, thank you for the advice. Seems I still have a long way to learn :)
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman and kuruman
athenad07 said:
Okay! I will next time, thank you for the advice. Seems I still have a long way to learn :)
Post your results when you're ready. We'll be here.
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Thread 'Minimum mass of a block'
Here we know that if block B is going to move up or just be at the verge of moving up ##Mg \sin \theta ## will act downwards and maximum static friction will act downwards ## \mu Mg \cos \theta ## Now what im confused by is how will we know " how quickly" block B reaches its maximum static friction value without any numbers, the suggested solution says that when block A is at its maximum extension, then block B will start to move up but with a certain set of values couldn't block A reach...
Back
Top