Force on three Bolts holding up a Jet Engine

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the force on three bolts supporting a 1400-kg jet engine. The initial assumption was that the force on the bolts would be 0 Newtons since they are not moving, which is incorrect. The correct interpretation involves calculating the tension on each bolt, as they support the weight of the engine. Each bolt would therefore bear a load of approximately 4,600 Newtons when the plane is stationary. Understanding the distinction between net force and tension is crucial for solving this problem accurately.
mopit_011
Messages
17
Reaction score
8
Homework Statement
A 1400-kg jet engine is fastened to the fuselage of a passenger jet by just three bolts (this is the usual practice). Assume that each bolt supports one-third of the load. Calculate the force on each bolt as the plane waits in line for clearance to take off.
Relevant Equations
F=ma
y=y0+v0t+(at^2/2)
My solution was that there would be a force of 0 Newtons on the bolt as the bolt is not moving. But this answer is wrong. Where am I going wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mopit_011 said:
Homework Statement:: A 1400-kg jet engine is fastened to the fuselage of a passenger jet by just three bolts (this is the usual practice). Assume that each bolt supports one-third of the load. Calculate the force on each bolt as the plane waits in line for clearance to take off.
Relevant Equations:: F=ma
y=y0+v0t+(at^2/2)

My solution was that there would be a force of 0 Newtons on the bolt as the bolt is not moving. But this answer is wrong. Where am I going wrong?
I doubt they mean to ask for the net force, though I agree that is a strictly correct interpretation. Rather, they want the tension on each bolt.
 
haruspex said:
I doubt they mean to ask for the net force, though I agree that is a strictly correct interpretation. Rather, they want the tension on each bolt.
Ohhhh ok. Thank you so much!
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Back
Top