Forces acting on a ring. (Help with direction)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the unknown force acting on a ring in equilibrium, given three coplanar forces: 200 N at 30 degrees, 500 N at 80 degrees, and 300 N at 240 degrees. The calculated magnitude of the unknown force is 351 N, with an angle of 71.7 degrees, which must be adjusted by adding 180 degrees to find the correct direction, resulting in 251.7 degrees relative to the x-axis. The confusion arises from interpreting angles relative to different axes, highlighting the importance of consistent reference points in vector analysis.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector addition and equilibrium principles
  • Knowledge of trigonometric functions and angle measurement
  • Familiarity with free-body diagrams and force representation
  • Basic physics concepts related to forces and motion
NEXT STEPS
  • Study vector resolution techniques in physics
  • Learn how to construct and interpret free-body diagrams
  • Research the principles of static equilibrium in mechanics
  • Explore trigonometric identities and their applications in force calculations
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physics students, engineers, and anyone involved in mechanics or structural analysis, particularly those dealing with forces and equilibrium in systems.

RocketSurgery
Messages
115
Reaction score
3
1. Problem: The following coplanar forces pull on a ring: 200 N at 30 degrees, 500N at 80 degrees, 300N at 240 Degrees, and an unknown force. Find the magnitude and direction of the unknown force for the ring if the ring is in equilibrium.

2. Solution(So Far): Using the line 0 Degrees as the x-axis and 90 Degrees as the y-axis I got 351 N for the force (correct according to the book) however I am unable to find what angle it should be at. For the angle I got 71.7 Degrees [The book lists the answer as 71.7+180=351]. After seeing this answer I thought about it and I understand turning it 90 Degrees but why 180 degrees?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How did you find the force to be 351 N at 71.7 degrees? Did you add the three given forces to get that answer? If so, remember the unknown force must be equal and opposite to that sum in order to produce equilibrium. To find the direction opposite to an angle, add 180 degrees. (Not 90!)
RocketSurgery said:
[The book lists the answer as 71.7+180=351].
I presume this is a typo on your part?
 
No the book lists the answer as 351 N is that wrong? I understand why the angle needs to be opposite but is the force also wrong? If you mean the direction of the vector than that is what they asked for the angle for.

I know you need to add 180 to put it in equilibrium. I added 90 because it was 71.7 relative to the y-axis instead of relative to the x-axis so the angle with respect to the x-axis is 161.7 so I got confused (I should have drew my diagram with all angles w/respect to the x-axis).
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K