Forces on Negative Charge in 4-Charge Square System

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the force experienced by a negative charge in a square configuration of four point charges, each with a magnitude of 5.5μC. Using Coulomb's Law and the Coulomb constant (k = 8.9875 x 10^9 Nm^2/C^2), the user initially calculated forces from adjacent positive charges and a diagonal charge. The user encountered confusion regarding the correct method to combine these forces, particularly in determining the resultant force's components and magnitude. The final computed forces were 0.465 N for the two nearest charges and 0.233 N for the diagonal charge, leading to questions about proper vector addition.

PREREQUISITES
  • Coulomb's Law for electrostatic force calculations
  • Understanding of vector addition in physics
  • Knowledge of free body diagrams
  • Familiarity with the Pythagorean theorem for distance calculations
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the application of Coulomb's Law in multi-charge systems
  • Study vector addition techniques for forces in two dimensions
  • Learn about the significance of the Coulomb constant in electrostatics
  • Explore the concept of electric field strength and its relation to force
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, electrical engineers, and anyone interested in electrostatics and force calculations in multi-charge systems will benefit from this discussion.

Punchlinegirl
Messages
221
Reaction score
0
Four point charges, each of magnitude 5.5\muC, are placed at the corners of a square 76.5 cm on a side. The value of Coulomb's constant is 8.9875 x 10^9 Nm^2/C^2. If three of the charges are positive and one is negative, find the magnitude of the force experienced by the negative charge. Answer in units of N.

First I drew a free body diagram and found that the negative charge would be attracted to all of the other charges. So then I used Coulomb's Law.
F_14= 1/4\pi\epsilon_o * (5.5 x 10^-6 *5.5 x 10^-6)/ .765^2. I know that E_o = 8.85 x 10^-12, by setting 8.9875 x 10^9= 1/4\pi \epsilon_o.
Solving this gave me 4.58 x 10^-22.
This would be the force for 2 of the charges, since all of the charges and distances are equal, except one force is in the x-direction, and the other is in the y-direction.
Next I solved for the other force, which would be the diagonal from the negative charge. I found the distance between the two charges to be 1.08 m by using the pythagorean theorem.
I split it up into x and y components and used Coulomb's Law.
In the x-direction:
F= 1/4\pi \epsilon_0 * (5.5 x 10^-6 * 5.5 x 10^-6) / 1.08^2 * (.765/1.08). and I got 1.83 x 10^-11.
Since it is a square, I got the y-direction to be the exact same thing.
Then I added together the components for both parts to get 1.83 x 10^-11 in both directions. Then I did the \sqrt (1.83 x 10^-11)^2 +(1.83 x 10^-11)^2 for my final force and found it to be 2.59 x 10^-11, which isn't right. Can someone help me? thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1/4\pi \epsilon_0 * (5.5 x 10^-6 * 5.5 x 10^-6) / 1.08^2 * (.765/1.08).

This does not seem right. The distance of the diagonal is 1.08 m, but why multiply by 0.765/1.08?

Since the two + charges on the adjacent legs are equally apart and perpendicular, the net force will be along the diagonal.
 
I multiplied it by .765/1.08 because that is what the sin/cos is equal to. I thought I needed to have that for the x and y directions.
Do I just take that part out from each of the forces I calculated and add everything together?
I'm confused on where to go from here.
 
I got .465 N on my calculator, for the nearby charges.
You know that the Force by the farther charge is LESS ...

Re-key your computation!

the Coulomb constant k = 9E9 Nm^2/C^2 is easier to use than epsilon ...
 
Ok I got the .465 for the two nearest charges, and I got .233 for the charge that is furthest away. Do I add these together? Or do I need to break the one that's furthest into components?
 
Do you want the answer in (F_x , F_y) components, or magnitude?
Either split the small one into x,y (before adding to the big ones);
or add the two big ones by Pythagoras (before adding to the small one)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
800
Replies
13
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
824
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
989
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
862
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
1K