Graduate Understanding the Form Factor in Electron Scattering

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the derivation of the form factor for electron scattering in a static potential, specifically addressing a mathematical step in Thomson's "Modern Particle Physics." The key point is the integration process where fixing ##\vec{r}'## allows the separation of the integral into two parts, leading to the identification of the form factor. It is clarified that since the limits of integration are from ##-\infty## to ##+\infty##, the integral remains unchanged regardless of the value of ##\vec{r}'##, permitting the substitution of a constant vector ##\vec{r_0}##. This simplification enables the transformation of the integral into a more manageable form, demonstrating that the method is valid under these conditions. The discussion emphasizes the importance of the limits of integration in justifying the mathematical manipulation.
Fosheimdet
Messages
15
Reaction score
2
I'm reading through Thomson's "Modern Particle Physics", and I've gotten stuck at a point in the derivation of the form factor for electron scattering in a static potential due to an extended charge distribution. It's just a mathematical "trick" i don't quite get.

He goes from

$$\int\int e^{i\vec{q}.(\vec{r}-\vec{r}')} e^{i\vec{q}.\vec{r}'} \frac{Q\rho(\vec{r}')}{4\pi|\vec{r}-\vec{r}'|} d^3\vec{r}' d^3\vec{r}$$

Then asks us to "fix" ##\vec{r}'## and integrate over ##d^3\vec{r}## with substitution ##\vec R = \vec r - \vec r'##, which separates the integral into two parts:

$$ \int e^{i\vec{q}.\vec R} \frac{Q}{4\pi|\vec R|} d^3\vec R \int \rho(\vec r') e^{i\vec{q}.\vec{r}'} d^3 \vec r'$$

Where the latter integral is the form factor.

How does this make sense? ##\vec R ## is a function of ##\vec r'## and thus needs to be included in the integral over ##d^3\vec r'##. If they really want to fix ##\vec r'## then ##d^3 \vec r' = 0## and the whole expression should be zero, no?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Suggestion: Do the integral over ## d^3 r ## first, (leaving the ## r' ## in there), (and pulling the terms with just ## r' ## out front as a constant), and I think it is apparent that the integral over ## d^3 r ## that involves terms with ## r-r' ## will be independent of the value of the fixed ##r' ##, (also, since the limits on the ## d^3 r ## integral are essentially ## -\infty ## and ## +\infty ##, and will not be changed by the ## r' ##). Thereby, it is permissible to drop ## r' ## in those terms and replace it with an integration over ## R ##.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
Charles Link said:
Suggestion: Do the integral over ## d^3 r ## first, (leaving the ## r' ## in there), (and pulling the terms with just ## r' ## out front as a constant), and I think it is apparent that the integral over ## d^3 r ## that involves terms with ## r-r' ## will be independent of the value of the fixed ##r' ##, (also, since the limits on the ## d^3 r ## integral are essentially ## -\infty ## and ## +\infty ##, and will not be changed by the ## r' ##). Thereby, it is permissible to drop ## r' ## in those terms and replace it with an integration over ## R ##.

I see. The ##\vec r'## will simply shift the origin of ## f(\vec r) = e^{i\vec q \cdot (\vec r-\vec r')} \frac{Q}{4\pi |\vec r-\vec r'|} ## and because the integral limits are ##-\infty## and ##+\infty##, the integral will be the same for every value of ##\vec r'##. We can therefore set ## \vec r' = \vec {r_0} ## under this integral, where ##\vec r_0## is any constant vector. We can now pull this integral out, since it is independent of ##\vec r'##
$$\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} e^{\vec q \cdot (\vec r - \vec r_0)} \frac{Q}{4\pi |\vec r - \vec r_0|} d^3 \vec r \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \rho(\vec r') e^{i\vec q \cdot \vec r'} d^3\vec r' $$ and if we now define ## \vec R = \vec r - \vec r_0 ##, we get ##d^3\vec R = d^3\vec r## (Since ##\vec {r_0} ## is constant), and thus

$$M_{fi} = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} e^{\vec q \cdot \vec R} \frac{Q}{4\pi |\vec R|} d^3 \vec R \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \rho(\vec r') e^{i\vec q \cdot \vec r'} d^3\vec r' $$

Had the integral limits been finite, this would in general not have worked since shifting the origin of ##f(\vec r)## would mean integrating over a different part of ##f(\vec r)##.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and Charles Link

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
835
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K