Formalism for an extended object

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter alejandrito29
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the paper titled "Formalism for an Extended Object," which explores the relationship between manifold coordinates (x^u) and submanifold coordinates (y^i) within a given metric (g_{uv}). The induced metric is defined as h_{ij}=d_ix^ud_jx^vg_{uv}. The energy-momentum tensor is expressed as T^{uv}(Z^a)= \int dy^{p+1} \frac{\sqrt{h}}{\sqrt{g}}h^{ij}d_ix^ud_jx^v \delta (x^a-Z^a), where Z^a and x^a are identified as dummy variables. The discussion also draws parallels to the Fourier transform, emphasizing the transformation between different coordinate representations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of differential geometry and manifolds
  • Familiarity with energy-momentum tensors in theoretical physics
  • Knowledge of coordinate transformations in mathematical physics
  • Basic comprehension of Fourier transforms and their applications
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of induced metrics in differential geometry
  • Research energy-momentum tensors in the context of general relativity
  • Explore coordinate transformations and their implications in physics
  • Learn about the applications of Fourier transforms in various fields of physics
USEFUL FOR

The discussion is beneficial for theoretical physicists, mathematicians specializing in differential geometry, and students exploring advanced concepts in general relativity and coordinate transformations.

alejandrito29
Messages
148
Reaction score
0
i am read a paper of name: "formalism for an extended object"(in spanish)..
a sub manifold of coordinates [tex]y^i[/tex] i=0...p embebed in a manifold with coordinates [tex]x^u[/tex] u=0...D with metric [tex]g_{uv}[/tex]
the induced metric is:

[tex]h_{ij}=d_ix^ud_jx^vg_{uv}[/tex]

The paper says that the energy momentum tensor is:
[tex]T^{uv}(Z^a)= \int\! dy^{p+1} \, \frac{\sqrt{h}}{\sqrt{g}}h^{ij}d_ix^ud_jx^v \delta (x^a-Z^a)[/tex]

but the paper does not say : ¿what is [tex]Z^a[/tex] and [tex]x^a[/tex]?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


They are just dummy variables. Look at the Fourier transform, for instance

[tex]F(s) = \int \exp{(2 \pi i t s f(t))} dt[/tex]

s and t are just dummy variables, similar to Z and x. While the Fourier transform transforms between the frequency and time domain, the transform you quote from the paper transforms the stress energy tensor between the representation in the original manifold coordinates and the submanifold coordinates. Though I'm not quite positive that I have the direction correct, it might do the reverse...
 


pervect said:
the transform you quote from the paper transforms the stress energy tensor between the representation in the original manifold coordinates and the submanifold coordinates. .


mmm thanks, but, i don't understand

x: manifold coordinate
y: submanifold coordinate

¿and z?
¿yo says :the transform is between the representation inthe original manifold (x?) and the submanifor coordinates(y?) ?
¿what is z?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
6K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 76 ·
3
Replies
76
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K