Forming a general summation of terms

  • Thread starter MathewsMD
  • Start date
  • #1
433
7
Hi,

I was trying to form a summation for ##y_1## and have provided a solution but do not quite understand how it was formulated. I was trying to look for general patters and besides a ##(-1)^{n+1}x^2n## in the numerator, I'm a little lost on how to find a general term for the denominator. Also, is the pi just another summation symbol inside of the sigma summation? Does the symbol have any other meaning? Any help regarding how to approach this questions would be greatly appreciated!
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2014-12-12 at 8.54.55 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2014-12-12 at 8.54.55 PM.png
    30.4 KB · Views: 378

Answers and Replies

  • #2
Stephen Tashi
Science Advisor
7,633
1,492
The [itex] \prod [/itex] symbol denotes a product instead of a sum.
For example
[itex] \prod_{k=1}^3 (2k+ 1) = (2+1)(4+1)(6+1) [/itex]
 
  • #3
433
7
The [itex] \prod [/itex] symbol denotes a product instead of a sum.
For example
[itex] \prod_{k=1}^3 (2k+ 1) = (2+1)(4+1)(6+1) [/itex]

Thank you. Just wondering, how was the summation formulated, though? I can check it and it works, but would not have devised that easily myself. Any hints on catching on to this particular pattern?
 
  • #4
Stephen Tashi
Science Advisor
7,633
1,492
Were y1 and y2 just given to you? I notice they are handwritten. Did you derive them yourself?
 

Related Threads on Forming a general summation of terms

Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
1K
Top