Formula to Balance Logarithmic or Continuously Compounding ?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on calculating the optimal balance between reinvesting profits and withdrawing them to maximize investment growth. Key variables include the final amount (F), principal investment (P), rate of return (r), number of interest periods (n), and additional investment per period (A). The formula presented is F = P(1+r)^{n} + A((1+r)^{n} - 1)/n. The conversation highlights the trade-offs between short-term profitability and long-term compounding potential, emphasizing a balanced reinvestment strategy of 50% profits for maximum efficiency.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of compound interest and reinvestment strategies
  • Familiarity with financial formulas and variables
  • Basic knowledge of stock trading and risk management
  • Ability to perform mathematical calculations involving exponential growth
NEXT STEPS
  • Research "Compound Interest Formula" for deeper insights into investment growth
  • Study "Risk Management in Trading" to understand investment safety
  • Explore "Reinvestment Strategies for Stocks" to optimize profit allocation
  • Learn about "Financial Modeling Techniques" to apply these concepts practically
USEFUL FOR

Investors, financial analysts, and traders looking to optimize their investment strategies by balancing profit reinvestment and withdrawal for enhanced growth potential.

Aston08
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
If I was interested in determining how to balance the rate of reinvestment of profits back into the original investment (to add to its compounding potential) while still growing the profit return on the investment.


How would I go about calculating something like that ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Aston08 said:
If I was interested in determining how to balance the rate of reinvestment of profits back into the original investment (to add to its compounding potential) while still growing the profit return on the investment.


How would I go about calculating something like that ?

I am not sure I totally understand what you are asking but I take a stab at an answer...

Where F = the final amount in the account, P = the principal invenstment, r = the rate of return per interest period, n = the number of interest periods, and A = additonal investment per insterest period, then:

F= P(1+r)^{n} + A((1+r)^{n} - 1)/n
 
Ynaught -

It is pretty much the same concept as here. I just don't know how to do the calculations.

http://demonstrations.wolfram.com/HowMuchShouldIReinvestInABusiness/



The balance comes into play because the final price can never be determined up front and therefore creates 2 problems that need to be solved for:

1.) Continual reinvestment of profits will negatively impact the profitability of an investment in the short term but exponentially add to the profit potential in the long term.
2.) Withdrawal of accumulated profits will lock in profit from the investment, but harm the long term potential of the investment to compound.



Maximum Reinvestment Efficiency
Mathematically determining the most efficient way to reinvest the profits from a successful investment after the value of the investment has risen enough to cover the value of the initial risk and covering the future costs of risk thereafter, assuming a constant amount of risk is to be used during the life of the investment (i.e. no more than $300) .

Example –

• Starting Value = $30,000
• Account risk per trade = (1% of 30K = $300)
• Cost per Share = $100
• $ Risk per Share Using a 5% Protective Stop per Share = $100 x 5% = $5.00 (i.e. we can afford to lose $5 per share before we have to sell it)
• # Shares = $300 (Total Risk per Trade) / $5.00 (Maximum Risk per Share) = 60 Shares
• Commission Cost = $0.50 per Share each way ($0.50 to Buy & $0.50 to Sell = $1.00 Total)

Determine the following -
1. Amount of investment growth required for breakeven
2. Rate of reinvestment of profits to balance maximum profit and maximum rate of reinvestment
- a. Should not reinvest so heavily that investment is never profitable or invest so little that long term profit compounding potential is negatively affected – i.e. ideally 50%/50% Balance


1% Total Risk using 5% stop
Amount at Risk = $300
Purchasing Power = 60x Shares @ $100
Total Value of Position @ Entry = $6000
Value @ Exit = $6,900
Potential Profit = $900

If the stock rises 10% to $110 the value of the original investment is $6,600. Enough to cover the cost of the initial risk ($300) as well as the additional $300 risk to be reused to reinvest future profits without having to incur the original $300 every time.

1% Total Risk using 5% stop
Amount at Risk = $300
Total Value of Position @ Entry = $6,000
Purchasing Power = 60x Shares @ $100
Added additional 54 Shares @ $110
Totaling of 114 Shares @ Avg of $105
Total Cost of Position After Reinvesting Profit = $11,970
Value @ $115 Exit = $13,110
Potential Profit = $1,140
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
11K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
613
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K