MHB Formula to use instead of model

  • Thread starter Thread starter BTH
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Formula Model
BTH
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Scenario: An average of 5 test subjects are brought into a study in subsequent months and are administered 1 monthly test for as long as they remain part of the study. The time they remain in the study is 3 months.

Could someone please explain a formula or technique to sum the number of expected tests per month and total if possible in lieu of having to model it out like below to capture the dynamic of subjects rolling on and off over time? My real example has many more subjects and time on study varies, so a formula would save a lot of time at scale.

View attachment 7679
 

Attachments

  • Test cascade.PNG
    Test cascade.PNG
    3 KB · Views: 113
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I don't think there's anything that's going to make this more convenient than counting the number of users enrolled during a particular month. Using a spreadsheet will speed things up somewhat.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top