smodak
- 457
- 250
The discussion revolves around a free book titled "Quantum Mechanics for Engineers" by Dommelen, with participants sharing their thoughts on its content, structure, and relevance to their understanding of quantum mechanics. The conversation touches on the prerequisites for studying quantum mechanics and the author's humorous writing style.
Participants generally agree on the value of the book and its content, but there is no consensus on the necessity of mastering classical mechanics and mathematics before studying quantum mechanics, with differing opinions on the prerequisites required.
Some participants express uncertainty about the extent of classical mechanics knowledge required, indicating a reliance on personal experience and varying interpretations of the material.
berkeman said:Very nice, thanks! I like the title
I've bookmarked it and will go through it more soon. I like how it starts with a review of what I learned in undergrad and moves on to subjects I've read about on the PF and beyond. Thanks @smodak![]()
I am very interested to follow Balakrishnan's lectures. Just tell one thing: for starting quantum, do you need to go through the whole classical course? I have an idea of Hamiltonian and Lagrangian and also how to draw phase trajectories and understand autonomous systems. Is that enough?smodak said:I was just watching this lecture by prof. Balakrishnan
Wrichik Basu said:I am very interested to follow Balakrishnan's lectures. Just tell one thing: for starting quantum, do you need to go through the whole classical course? I have an idea of Hamiltonian and Lagrangian and also how to draw phase trajectories and understand autonomous systems. Is that enough?
By the way, thanks for the book![]()