# Four Charges In a square (Electric Fields)

• Noisuf
In summary: Now add the x and y components separately to get the resultant x and y components:E(x) = E(TL,x) + E(TR,x) + E(BL,x) + E(BR,x) E(y) = E(TL,y) + E(TR,y) + E(BL,y) + E(BR,y)Finally, use the magnitudes and directions of the resultant components to find the magnitude and direction of the resultant electric field at point X.E = sqrt(E(x)^2 + E(y)^2)Direction = tan^-1(E(y)/E(x))In summary, the problem involves four charges arranged in a square with two positive and two negative charges. The magnitude of each charge is |
Noisuf

## Homework Statement

Four charges are arranged in a square. 2 Positive and 2 negative, in opposite corners. The magnitude is |1.6x10^-6 C|. The square's sides are 1 cm. A] At point X (Midpoint of of one of the sides. See Picture) Find the electric field direction and magnitude. B] What is the force of an electron at point X. C] What is the force on an electron that is very far away from the four poles.

E=(Kq)/r^2 F=qE

## The Attempt at a Solution

For A I know the electric field for all for points using the first equation. But at that point i don't know how to add them using vectors and what not. I added the top 2 and got 8.9X10^7. But I know the bottom two do something to the point, but i don't know what.

For B i know how to find once i have the field quantity. Just multiply it by the charge of the electron.

For C I guess my teacher means at infinity, therefore the field is 0. and with equation 2 makes the force 0, and making it an equilibrium.

Thanks for any help.

#### Attachments

• physics.jpg
7.6 KB · Views: 750
Resolve each E vector from each charge at point X into horizontal and vertical components then add the components to get the net components. Use the net components to find the magnitude and direction.

Ok after trying this and thinking of it like that don't the top 2 cancel out? and I am not sure how to add in the bottom two vector wise. The bottom twos vectors meet at point x in a equal in magnitude but opposite in direction, why does that not cancel out?

Since the picture is not visible yet, it would help if you first clarified some positions.

Top-left = + or - ?
Top-right = + or - ?
Bot-left = + or - ?
Bot-right = + or - ?

X = top or bot or left or right?

top left +
top right -
bottom left -
bottom right +

x is mid point of top two

Do this one charge at a time.

You have calculated the field at X due to the + charge at the top left (TL)?

What is its magnitude and direction? How would you draw the vector representing this field at point X?

Ok for the top left (+) I have calculated a field E=k(1.6x10^-6)/(.005m)= 5.696x10^8 N/C
This vector is pointing towards X. For the negative in the top. The quantity is negative same math. -5.696x10^8 N/C. The vector is going away. Adding these 2 = 0? or do you just add the magnitude. Then its 1.1x10^9 N/C. The bottom two still don't make any sense. The vector points away from the positive toward x, and for the negative, x points toward it. In the horizontal components are the same as the top, but in reverse. The vertical components will use the radius 1cm, but still they are opposite in direction so cancel out? I'm not very good with vectors :(

I can only recommend that you properly learn how to resolve vectors and find the resultant (sum) of several vectors by means of vector resolution. This should be covered in the early part of your physics textbook (probably from a previous class on mechanics).

Ok I have reviewed vector addition and I am coming up with 1.37x10^-7 N/C Pointing up from X. If anyone has worked this problem, can anyone confirm.

Sorry for the delay.

I haven't checked the numbers on this but:

1. The resultant does not point upwards - you must be making a mistake.
2. In the top line of post #7, it appears you forgot to square the distance in the denominator.

If you still have time for this, fill in the magnitudes and directions for each of the 4 fields due to the charges located in the 4 corners (TL, TR, BL, BR):

E(TL) =
E(TR) =
E(BL) =
E(BR) =

Next, you need to resolve these into their horizontal (x) and vertical (y) components.

E(TL,x) =
E(TL,y) =

E(TR,x) =
E(TR,y) =

E(BL,x) =
E(BL,y) =

E(BR,x) =
E(BR,y) =

## 1. What is the concept of "Four Charges In a Square" in Electric Fields?

The concept of "Four Charges In a Square" in Electric Fields refers to a scenario in which four point charges are arranged at the corners of a square, with each charge having a specific magnitude and direction. This setup allows for the study of the electric fields and forces between these charges.

## 2. How are the electric fields calculated in this scenario?

The electric fields in this scenario are calculated using Coulomb's Law, which states that the magnitude of the electric field at a specific point is directly proportional to the magnitude of the charge and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between the two charges.

## 3. What is the direction of the electric fields in this setup?

The direction of the electric fields in this setup is determined by the direction of the force that would be exerted on a positive test charge placed at that point. The direction of the electric field is always away from positive charges and towards negative charges.

## 4. How does the distance between the charges affect the electric fields?

The distance between the charges has a significant impact on the strength of the electric fields. As the distance between the charges increases, the electric fields decrease in magnitude. This is because the inverse square relationship between distance and electric fields causes the field to spread out over a larger area.

## 5. Can the concept of "Four Charges In a Square" be applied to real-world situations?

Yes, the concept of "Four Charges In a Square" can be applied to real-world situations, such as the arrangement of atoms in a molecule or the positioning of electronic components in a circuit. However, in these cases, the charges may not be exactly at the corners of a square and may have different magnitudes and directions, making the calculations more complex.

Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
639
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
26
Views
1K