Four-Vector Physics: Exploring Questions

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter actionintegral
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of four-vectors in the context of electromagnetism, specifically focusing on the relationships between the four-potential, four-gradient, and four-momentum. Participants explore the mathematical formulations and implications of these concepts, including the covariant nature of derivatives and the role of charge in the dynamics described by these vectors.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether the negative four-gradient of the four-potential is equal to the time derivative of the four-momentum, suggesting a potential relationship.
  • Another participant argues against this equality, noting that the indices do not balance and asks for clarification on what is meant by "time derivative."
  • Several participants emphasize the need for proper time in the context of the time derivative of momentum, asserting that the equation must be expressed covariantly.
  • There is a reference to the Lorentz Force equation, indicating that the four-velocity and charge are critical components in the dynamics described by the four-momentum.
  • One participant acknowledges the importance of charge in the context of forces acting on a body and cites a source for clarification on the four-potential and related equations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the relationship between the four-gradient and the time derivative of the four-momentum, with no consensus reached on the initial question posed. There is also a recognition of the need for proper time in the equations discussed, but the exact formulations and interpretations remain contested.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the importance of covariant formulations and the role of charge in the dynamics of four-vectors, indicating that assumptions about these elements are critical to the discussion. The mathematical steps and relationships are not fully resolved, leaving room for further exploration.

actionintegral
Messages
305
Reaction score
5
I am trying to get a handle on four-vectors. I see that there is a thing called a four-potential, a four-gradient, and a four momentum.

Is it reasonable to ask if the negative four-gradient of the four-potential is equal to the time derivative of the four-momentum?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
actionintegral said:
I am trying to get a handle on four-vectors. I see that there is a thing called a four-potential, a four-gradient, and a four momentum.

Is it reasonable to ask if the negative four-gradient of the four-potential is equal to the time derivative of the four-momentum?

No. Transcribing what you said: [tex]-\nabla_a A_b \stackrel{?}{=} \frac{d}{dt} p_a[/tex]. The indices don't balance.

(Note the four-potential [tex]A_a[/tex] refers to the electromagnetic potential, which decomposes in an observer's coordinate system into the scalar potential [tex]\phi[/tex] and the vector potential [tex]\vec A[/tex].)

By "time derivative", do you mean derivative with respect to proper-time?
 
Last edited:
The "four-potential" must be the electromagnetic potential [itex]A_\mu[/itex]. Try writing down your second sentence as a tensor equation, it doesn't make sense, and the time derivative of the momentum is not covariant, you need to use the proper time [itex]\tau[/itex]. However, IIRC

[itex] \frac{dp_\mu}{d\tau} = (\partial_\mu A_\nu - \partial_\nu A_\mu)u^\nu[/itex]

where [itex]u^\nu[/itex] is the 4-velocity of a body. But note what the space part of this equation reduces to in the rest frame of the body.
 
Last edited:
Daverz said:
The "four-potential" must be the electromagnetic potential [itex]A_\mu[/itex]. Try writing down your second sentence as a tensor equation, it doesn't make sense, and the time derivative of the momentum is not covariant, you need to use the proper time [itex]\tau[/itex]. However, IIRC

[itex] \frac{dp_\mu}{d\tau} = (\partial_\mu A_\nu - \partial_\nu A_\mu)u^\nu[/itex]

where [itex]u^\nu[/itex] is the 4-velocity.

There's a [tex]q[/tex] on the right hand side and, possibly, a conventional choice of sign. This is the Lorentz Force expression on the right.

Note: [tex]\frac{dp_b}{d\tau}=u^a\nabla_a p_{b}=m u^a\nabla_a u_{b}[/tex].
 
Yeah, I sort of forgot that charge stuff. Kind of important if you want there to be any force on the body. Looking it up this time (Ohanian, Gravitation and Spacetime, 2nd ed, pp. 95-97:

[itex] A^\mu = (\phi, A_x, A_y, A_z)[/itex]

[itex] F^{\mu\nu} = \partial^\mu A^\nu - \partial^\nu A^\mu[/itex]

[itex] \frac{dp^\mu}{d\tau} = \frac{q}{m}p_\nu F^{\mu \nu}[/itex]
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K