Fourier analysis of a Lorentzian/Cauchy/Breit–Wigner distribution

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the challenges of performing Fourier analysis on a Lorentzian or Cauchy distribution, specifically the Breit–Wigner distribution. Users express difficulty in obtaining analytical solutions, even with tools like the Wolfram online integrator. Suggestions include exploring approximations for the distribution and utilizing the calculus of residues as a potential method to simplify the analysis. The conversation highlights the need for numerical integration techniques for those unfamiliar with the process.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Fourier analysis concepts and formulas
  • Familiarity with the Cauchy distribution and its properties
  • Basic knowledge of numerical integration techniques
  • Experience with calculus of residues for complex analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Research numerical integration methods, focusing on techniques like Simpson's rule and trapezoidal rule
  • Study the calculus of residues and its applications in simplifying integrals
  • Explore approximations for the Cauchy distribution, such as the use of Gaussian approximations
  • Learn about the properties and applications of the Breit–Wigner distribution in physics
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and students engaged in advanced calculus, particularly those working with Fourier analysis and statistical distributions.

nf405
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
So I'm supposed to do this but is it just me or is it too hard to do this analytically? (I put it into wolfram online integrator and he couldn't do it) I don't need it very accurate so are there any approximations to this distribution that I could use to make it easier? Anyone have any ideas of a clever way of doing this?

see http://mathworld.wolfram.com/CauchyDistribution.html

for the Cauchy distribution and

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourier_analysis

for Fourier analysis if you can't remember the formula

I've never done any numerical integration so if that's the only way I have to learn how to do that from scratch so any clever tricks I could use to avoid that would be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I suggest using the calculus of residues.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
10K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K