Fourier Basis functions question

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
3 replies · 4K views
mnb96
Messages
711
Reaction score
5
Hi,
the continuous Fourier Transform is often defined on a finite interval, usually [tex][-\pi,\pi][/tex]:

[tex]\hat{f_k} = \frac{1}{2\pi}\int_{-\pi}^{\pi}f(x)e^{-ikx}dx[/tex]

If I understood correctly, this allows the basis functions to be defined so that they have norm=1, and they form an orthonormal basis for [tex]L^2([-\pi,\pi])[/tex].
Now, I get confused when one tries to compute the FT of a function f in the whole [tex]\mathcal{R}[/tex] because:

1) The 2-norm of the basis functions goes to [tex]+\infty[/tex]
2) They are not square integrable
3) Should I conclude that the basis-functions are orthogonal but NOT orthonormal?
4) If (1,2,3) are correct, then what is the space spanned by the basis-functions?
5) Is it possible to define an orthonormal basis for [tex]L^2(\mathcal{R})[/tex] with Fourier basis ?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not familiar with a 2-norm but the basis is normalised "in my book" like so:

[tex]\int_{-\pi}^{\pi}\phi_{k}^{*}\phi_{k}dx = \frac{1}{2\pi}\int_{-\pi}^{\pi}e^{+ikx}e^{-ikx}dx = \frac{1}{2\pi}\int_{-\pi}^{\pi}dx = 1[/tex]

---
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Maybe I used an incorrect term, but indeed, you proved that the squared norm of the basis-functions are always 1.
The important points of my question (1,2,3,4,5) arise when the bounds of the integral are not anymore [tex][-\pi,\pi][/tex] but they become [tex](-\infty,+\infty)[/tex]

Basically, I wanted you to consider:
[tex]\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}\phi_{k}^{*}\phi_{k}dx[/tex]
and then, answer those questions.
 
I see what you mean now. In this case, I think you cannot define the basis.
But maybe there is a way to expand functions in an unnormalised basis.

---
 
Last edited by a moderator: