Fourier Series from m=1 to infinity

1 reply · 3K views · last reply
Dr_Pill
Messages
41
Reaction score
0
Simple question;


Handwritten-annotated page of a Fourier series derivation: integral of f(x) cos mx dx equals a_m pi, with a summation sign circled in red and the question where's the summation written beside it.


Why isn't it [itex]\sum[/itex] am (from m=1 to infinity)

Thanks in advance.
 
Last edited:
Dr_Pill said:
Simple question;
Handwritten-annotated calculus derivation: an equation for the integral of f(x) cos mx from minus pi to pi equals the integral of the Fourier series expansion times cos mx; step 4 expands it into a sum of integrals, with red marks circling the summation index and a red question mark labeled where's the summation.


Why isn't it [itex]\sum[/itex] am (from m=1 to infinity)

Thanks in advance.
In the first line, ##f(x)## was replaced with its Fourier series expansion:
$$f(x) = a_0 + \sum_{n=1}^{\infty}(a_n \cos nx + b_n \sin nx)$$
The ##n## is the index over which the sum is taken. The name of this index is arbitrary. In principle you could use ##m## instead:
$$f(x) = a_0 + \sum_{m=1}^{\infty}(a_m \cos mx + b_m \sin mx)$$
However, in this case that would cause a conflict because ##m## is already in use in the integrand on the left hand side:
$$\int_{-\pi}^{\pi} f(x) \cos mx dx$$