Fourier Transform of correlation functions

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the Fourier transform of correlation functions, exploring their physical significance, applications in various systems, and the reasons for their calculation in contexts such as Green's functions and experimental measurements.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants inquire about the usefulness and physical meaning of Fourier transforms of correlation functions.
  • One participant suggests that the correlation integral resembles a convolution integral, raising questions about the necessity of Fourier transforms in correlation function calculations.
  • Another participant explains that in translationally invariant systems, Green's functions are diagonal in momentum space, simplifying calculations and indicating momentum conservation.
  • It is noted that the Fourier transform of a correlation function is often what is experimentally measurable, particularly in techniques like neutron scattering and photoemission.
  • A participant presents a relationship between magnetic susceptibility and the Fourier transform of the correlation function at zero wavevector.
  • One example discusses how photo detection and filtering relate to the Fourier transform of a correlation function, emphasizing the advantages of measuring correlation functions over Fourier transforms due to their dynamic range.
  • Another participant mentions the relevance of Fourier transforms when studying Goldstone modes, particularly as these modes vanish at k->0.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various viewpoints on the significance and application of Fourier transforms of correlation functions, indicating that multiple competing views remain without a clear consensus.

Contextual Notes

Some discussions involve assumptions about translational invariance and the physical interpretation of momentum, which may not be universally applicable across all models.

elduderino
Messages
56
Reaction score
0
Why are they useful, what do they denote (physically or otherwise)...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Maybe this will help? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Convolution_theorem" .
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Yes, the correlation integral acts very much like a convolution integral, only with a plus sign... but I am not able to understand why while calculating correlation functions, or even green's functions, authors tend to caclulate their Fourier transforms as well.

thank you
 
The main reason is that in a translationally invariant system, Green's functions are diagonal in momentum space. This simplifies all calculations and turns matrix equations (e.g. Dyson equation) into algebraic equations that can be easily solved. The diagonality of correlation functions is one way of saying that "momentum is conserved", although the physical meaning of momentum varies from one model to another.
 
Last edited:
Usually the FT of a correlation function is what's experimentally measurable. Using neutron scattering or photoemission one measures the momentum of the emitted particle, and this directly relates to a moment correlation function or Green's function.
 
static susceptibility sum rule for magnetic systems:

[tex]\chi = \frac{\partial M}{\partial H} = k_B T \int_V d^d\mathbf{r} G(\mathbf{r}) = k_B T \hat{G}(\mathbf{k} = \mathbf{0})[/tex]

i.e., The magnetic susceptibility is related to the Fourier transform of the correlation function at zero wavevector.
 
As an example:
Normally one detects light with a photo detector. A photo detection is converted into electronic signal after some kind of filtering (or whatever is the frequency response of the system). Physically for a square-law detector the Fourier transform (FT) of a correlation provides the frequency spectrum of the signal. That is the simplest of the physical explanation. For example, if two waves interfere in which one of the wave is Doppler shifted the correlation function (or the auto-correlation function to be accurate from the detected signal) will be a sin function while its Fourier will be peaked at a frequency corresponding to the Doppler shift. One reason why correlation function is measured versus Fourier is its large dynamic range not affordable in Fourier. One could measure correlation function all the way from nanoseconds to minutes. Try this time scale with Fourier and see the amount of data needed...
 
When we want to study the Goldstone modes of the system, the Fourier transform is more desired because the Goldstone modes vanishes when k->0.
 
thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K