Fourier Transform of Heaviside function

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the Fourier transform of the function H(x-a)e^{-bx}, where H(x) is the Heaviside function. Participants are exploring the implications of the Heaviside function on the integration limits and the overall setup of the Fourier transform.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to apply the Fourier transform definition and considers integration by parts, while expressing uncertainty about the correctness of their approach. Some participants question the mixing of variables and suggest clarifying the variable used in the Fourier transform setup. Others inquire whether the integral should include the Heaviside function or if it can be simplified to just the exponential term.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing feedback on the original poster's attempts and raising questions about variable consistency and the correct form of the integral. There is no explicit consensus yet, but guidance has been offered regarding the variable usage.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the implications of the Heaviside function on the integration limits and the Fourier transform setup, with some expressing uncertainty about the integration process and the role of the Dirac Delta function.

EdisT
Messages
17
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Find the Fourier transform of H(x-a)e^{-bx}, where H(x) is the Heaviside function.

Homework Equations


\mathcal{F}[f(t)]=\frac{1}{2 \pi} \int_{- \infty}^{\infty} f(t) \cdot e^{-i \omega t} dt
Convolution theory equations that might be relevant:
\mathcal{F}[f(t) \cdot g(t)] = \mathcal{F}[f(t)] * \mathcal{F}[g(t)]
\mathcal{F}[e^{\alpha t} \cdot f(t)] = \mathcal{F}[f(t+\alpha t)]
Derivative of the Heaviside function:
H'(t) = \delta(t)
where \delta(t) is the Dirac Delta function.

The Attempt at a Solution


Using the first relevant equation, and assuming the Heaviside function simply changed the boundary conditions from a to infinity:
\mathcal{F}[H(x-a)e^{-bx}]=\frac{1}{2 \pi} \int_{a}^{\infty} e^{-bx} \cdot e^{-i \omega t} dt
= - \frac{1}{2 \pi} \left[\frac{i e^{-bx-i \omega t}}{\omega} \right]_{a}^{\infty} = - \frac{i e^{-bx-i \omega a}}{\sqrt{2\pi} \omega}

This was not right so I tried to take the integral of the Heaviside function via integration by parts:
\mathcal{F}[f(t)]=\frac{1}{2 \pi} \int_{- \infty}^{\infty}H(x-a)e^{-bx-i \omega t} dt
=\frac{1}{2 \pi} \left[\frac{-H(x-a)ie^{-bx-i \omega t}}{\omega} \right]_{-\infty}^{\infty} - \int_{\infty}^{\infty} \delta(x-a)e^{-bx-i \omega t}
At this point I could go on with the integration however I'm unsure if it'll lead to the right answer or if what I'm doing makes sense. I have considered using the last equation in part of the convolution theory section, to get an integral of perhaps H(x-a-i \omega t) but that doesn't seem right either.. I am unsure how to take the Fourier transformation of the Heaviside function, any help will be gladly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are mixing variables. Either use x or t, for this problem it is quite obvious that x is the variable and you need to set up your Fourier transform accordingly. (If it was in t, then your function would be a constant and the Heaviside would not change the integration domain.)
 
Would it then just be the integral from a to infinity of H(x-a)e^{-bx-i \omega x} dx or the integral from a to infinity of e^{-bx-i \omega x} ?
 
EdisT said:
Would it then just be the integral from a to infinity of H(x-a)e^{-bx-i \omega x} dx or the integral from a to infinity of e^{-bx-i \omega x} ?

Aren't these exactly the same thing?
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K